Archive for April, 2010

Bush Family Tree ???

April 30, 2010

Bush family tree.jpg

bush family tree 2.jpg

Marvin Bush:

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/marvin-bush-2//a>

Prescott Bush:

Prescott Bush & Hitler – Trading with the Enemy – Union Bank

Bush and the Union Banking Corporation
Bush was one of seven directors of the Union Banking Corporation, an investment bank controlled by the Thyssen family, which was seized in October 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act as being owned by “enemy aliens.” The assets were held by the government for the duration of the war, then returned afterward.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush/a>

George H.W. Bush:

EXACTLY 10 YEARS BEFORE 9/11/2001 WTC ATTACKS !!!! COINCIDENCE ???? HIS HARVARD SKULL & BONES NAME IS: MAGOG !!!

Neil Bush:

Invisible Empire:

More Prescott Bush Union Bank Hilter Details:

http://jordanmaxwell.com/articles/bits/images/union-bank/ccc.pdf/a>

http://jordanmaxwell.com/articles/bits/images/union-bank/bush-nazi-link.pdf/a>

George H W Bush’s Dad & George W Bush’s Grandpa
Watch Invisible Empire by Jason Bermas on youtube and google Neil Bush Hinckley Reagan Assassination also Silverado Savings & Loan and Keating Five & the RTC and Marvin Bush and 9/11 WTC OR simply type BUSH in my search box on this blog page at top right hand corner and hit enter !

Native Indians in Canada ???

April 30, 2010


Mass genocide of Mohawk children by UK Queen and Vatican uncovered in Canada
By Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd

BRANTFORD, ON, CANADA – Mass graves of Mohawk children have been uncovered by ground-penetrating radar at the Mohawk Institute, a residential school for Mohawk operated by the Church of England and the Vatican before its closure in 1970.

According to Rev. Kevin Annett, Secretary of the International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and States (www.itccs.org), the Mohawk Institute was “set up by the Anglican Church of England in 1832 to imprison and destroy generations of Mohawk children. This very first Indian [First Nations] residential school in Canada lasted until 1970, and, like in most residential schools, more than half of the children imprisoned there never returned. Many of them are buried all around the school.”

Preliminary scanning by ground penetrating radar adjacent to the now closed main building Mohawk Institute has revealed that “between 15-20 feet of soil” was brought in and put over the mass graves just before the Mohawk Institute closed in 1970 in order to camouflage the mass graves of Mohawk Children and avoid prosecution for genocide and crimes against humanity under the Geneva Conventions, the International Criminal Court, and cooperating national courts.

Genocide – Sterilization – Land Theft – Catholic Skullduggery

South Africa ???

April 30, 2010

ANC – African National Congress

AZ & Nazi Germany ??? Your Papers Please

April 30, 2010

Dem: Ariz. law like ‘Nazi Germany’
By: Kasie Hunt
April 26, 2010 04:04 PM EDT

A Colorado Democrat says Arizona is on its way to becoming a “police state” and its new immigration law is “reminiscent” of Nazi Germany.

“It is absolutely reminiscent of second class status of Jews in Germany prior to World War II when they had to have their papers with them at all times and were subject to routine inspections at the suspicion of being Jewish,” Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo), who is Jewish, told POLITICO.

“I fear that Arizona is headed for a police state and it really underscores the need for immigration reform at the federal level to fix our system,” he said.

Arizona’s new immigration law, signed last week by Gov. Jan Brewer (R), requires police officers to ask people for identification papers if they have “reasonable suspicion” to believe that someone is an undocumented immigrant. The law has sparked protests across the country and reignited a national debate over comprehensive immigration reform.

Polis was careful to point out he was not comparing the law to the Holocaust but rather to the period before the war when Jews were required to carry papers and identify themselves publicly.

“I think it’s a very fair comparison and I hope that we’re not headed on the same trajectory that Nazi Germany was,” Polis said. “But this was a very recent experience for Jewish Americans and Jews worldwide and it’s something that when we see similarities we start ringing alarm bells.”

Polis also said the politics underpinning the Arizona law would keep Jews firmly in the Democratic political camp.

“Many Jews have been uneasy with President Obama’s policy on Israel…but when they see scary policies, endorsed by mainstream Republicans, signed into law by mainstream Republicans, like this Arizona law, it means the only choice for Jewish voters is the Democratic Party,” he said.

Arizona Sen. John McCain (R) has called the Arizona law a “step forward” and a “good tool,” though his office has said his statements do not represent an endorsement of the law. His position is a dramatic switch from 2007, when he was a key proponent of comprehensive immigration reform.

© 2010 Capitol News Company, LLC

Tasers Now Forced Chemical Sedations ???

April 30, 2010

First police Tasers, now hypodermics?

A Police Federation article that appears to advocate the forced chemical sedation of suspects is a move into dangerous territory
Over the last decade or so, the police have had the run of things – vast investment, a huge increase in numbers (17,000), regiments of Police Support Community officers (16,000) to do the unglamorous jobs, and permission to write controversial policy that by-passes parliamentary scrutiny. That is why I took notice of an article from the Police Federation about “excited delirium” which subtly advocates the forcible chemical sedation of suspects by officers.

Kevin Huish, the custody specialist for the Police Federation, has returned from the conference of the Institute for the Prevention of Deaths in Custody – yes, there truly is such an organisation – with a description of excited delirium syndrome and the protocols for dealing with it.

The syndrome is defined in the Police magazine article by a multitude of symptoms, some of which may seem unnervingly familiar – running for no apparent reason; running wildly; being naked (trying to get cool); stripping off clothes (trying to get cool); apparent superhuman strength; seemingly unlimited endurance; violent resistance; violent resistance after being restrained; muscle rigidity; and the subject claiming “he can’t breathe”. In other words, pretty much anyone who is an agitated state, possibly because they have been wrongly arrested, have missed the last train out of Sheffield or cannot breathe because a police officer is kneeling on their windpipe.

Huish’s tactic is clear. “The Federation is currently undertaking work to formulate a strategy which we intend to lead to recognition and acceptance of excited delirious syndrome by the British medical profession.” Once this is achieved, it seems only a matter of time before officers are being issued with hypodermics as freely and thoughtlessly as they have been issued with thousands of Taser guns.

Naturally, this is presented as humane and sensible means to prevent some of the 92 deaths that occurred “following police contact” in Britain between 2008 and 2009, but I cannot be the only one to worry about the idea of chemical sedation of suspects, given what goes on in custody suites.

Recently, I was shown video footage from Charing Cross police station, London, of a man named Jermaine Wilson who had been wrongly arrested and was forcibly “restrained” after being a little sarcastic with one of the officers at the end of a long night of false accusations. During the course of the restraint, Wilson, who is black, yelled out that his neck was hurting and bit an officer. He was stripped, put in the cells and later charged with assault on a police officer.

It turned out that his neck had been seriously damaged in a car accident a few weeks before and that he had every right to cry out when five officers wrestled him to the ground and sat on him with one officer kneeling on his neck. Having seen the film, London magistrates threw out all charges, but I ask myself what would have happened if Charing Cross police had forcibly used a syringe loaded with sedative having “satisfied” themselves that Wilson exhibited symptoms of excited delirium? How much would Wilson have remembered of the incident? Would his neck have suffered greater injury? And would the administration of drugs not represent a considerable breach of Wilson’s rights as an innocent citizen?

No doubt there would be procedures before sedatives were used, but that does not reassure me after the numerous cases of innocent people being shot by British police equipped with one of the 10,000 Taser guns handed out by the Jacqui Smith 18 months ago. Last week we heard that Manchester police Tasered a man who was suffering from epileptic seizure and spent two weeks in hospital as a result. If the Police Federation get their way about sedation, how many epileptics will be Tasered and dangerously sedated before police realise they are not suffering from excited delirium syndrome?

This article in Police magazine represents an opening round in a campaign that I hope the medical profession will see is as much about police controlling people as about protecting prisoners. Too much policy has been devised and implemented by the police without proper debate. The mass surveillance of people’s movements by the automatic number-plate recognition (ANPR) camera network resulted from a policy decision taken by the Association of Police Officers – which has private company status and is therefore not subject to freedom of information requests – went ahead without primary legislation or one word of debate in parliament. The issues of Tasers went ahead without parliamentary involvement despite safety fears and the significant implications for relations between police and the public, which seem to me to be pretty bad at the moment.

Look at developments as whole – the use of Tasers to restrain, the possibility of forcible sedation and the introduction of virtual courts where defendants appear in front of magistrates court via a video link from the police station – and you will see that we are moving into dangerous territory where too many powers and far too much unmonitored control are being handed to a police force that is far from perfect.

Sedation of suspects is unacceptable.

FEMA Camps ???

April 29, 2010

WTC7 ???

April 29, 2010

WTC7 MULTIPLE EXPLOSIONS OF CONTROLLED DEMOLITION !!!!!!! SMOKING GUNS !!!!!

(Visible Explosions) NEW VIDEO SEPT 2011. WTC Building 7 Controlled Demolition.

In this video, you can see the bombs going off in WTC Building Seven which caused it to collapse. 9/11 was an inside job, wake up people and take back what has been stolen from you!

Download: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=SJUK0T4D

9/11 – silverstein – guliani

Dhimmitude ???

April 29, 2010

Had never heard the word until now—Type it into Google and start reading…Pretty interesting. Note that Muslims and certain other religions are exempt from the Obamacare penalties and it is supported by law. We are surrendering from within! We are being led by Obama right down the path to total control!

Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling non-muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically, it is the TAXING of non-muslims in exchange for tolerating their presence AND as a coercive means of converting conquered remnants to islam.

The ObamaCare bill is the establishment of Dhimmitude and Sharia muslim diktat in the United States . Muslims are specifically exempted from the government mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be “gambling”, “risk-taking” and “usury” and is thus banned. Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this. How convenient. So I, Ann Barnhardt, a Christian, will have crippling IRS liens placed against all of my assets, including real estate, cattle, and even accounts receivables, and will face hard prison time because I refuse to buy insurance or pay the penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such penalty and will have 100% of his health needs paid for by the de facto government insurance. Non-muslims will be paying a tax to subsidize muslims. Period. This is Dhimmitude.

Dhimmitude serves two purposes: it enriches the muslim masters AND serves to drive conversions to islam. In this case, the incentive to convert to islam will be taken up by those in the inner-cities as well as the godless Generation X, Y and Z types who have no moral anchor. If you don’t believe in Christ to begin with, it is no problem whatsoever to sell Him for 30 pieces of silver. “Sure, I’ll be a muslim if it means free health insurance and no taxes. Where do I sign, bro?”

US Bankrupt @ $338B per Year ???

April 29, 2010

WHY is the USA BANKRUPT?

Informative, and mind boggling!

If you think it’s the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that are bankrupting us, then read this and then have another thought:

Boy, was I confused. I have been hammered with the propaganda that it is the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and the war on terror that are bankrupting us. And while not good, there seems to be a much bigger problem.

I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. I also have included the URL’s for verification of all the following facts…

1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments.

Verify at: http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8

2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML

3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.HTML

4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt..0.HTML

5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML

6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/%20TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML

7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.CNN.com/TRANscriptS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML <http://transcripts/..

8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

Verify at: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML

9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSC%20RI%20PTS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn..com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt.01.HTML %3C;

11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries.. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the US from the Southern border.

Verify at: Homeland Security Report:

12. The National policy Institute, estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.'

Verify at: http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute..org/PDF/deportation.PDF

13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.

Verify at: http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm <

14.. 'The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One million sex crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .'

Verify at: http: // http://www.drdsk.com/articleshtml <http://ww/%20w.drdsk.com/articleshtml <

The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR AND IF YOU'RE LIKE ME HAVING TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY; IT IS $338,300,000,000.00 WHICH WOULD BE ENOUGH TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY.

Are we THAT stupid?

YES WE ARE, FOR LETTING THOSE IN THE U.S.CONGRESS GET AWAY WITH LETTING THIS HAPPEN YEAR AFTER YEAR!!!!!

Pope May Face Charges ???

April 29, 2010


Neil Bush

Pope Ratzinger and the Bushes: Two Peas In a Pedophile Protection Pod
By Lori Price, http://www.legitgov.org 05 April 2010 -Updated:24 Apr 2010

A Newsday article from 2005 details the dirtbags, including Neil Bush, who served on Pope Ratzinger’s ‘ecumenical foundation’ — all protected from on ‘High.’ Also in 2005, Pope Rat asked US President [sic] George W. Bush to ‘declare the pontiff immune from liability’ in a lawsuit that accused him of conspiring to cover up the molestation of three boys by a seminarian in Texas. In September 2005, the U.S. asserted that the lawsuit should be dismissed, as the Pope enjoys immunity as head of state of the Holy See.

Pope may face charges at US court 24 Apr 2010 The US Supreme Court may take legal action against the Pope over allegations that he conspired to conceal sex abuse charges brought against a Wisconsin priest. A case lodged by an alleged sex abuse victim has brought certain documents to prosecutors’ attention that suggest the current Pope, who was then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, and two other officials, conspired to keep the case secret because the accused was a major church fundraiser.

The New Pope Benedict XVI –Neil Bush, Ratzinger co-founders — President’s younger brother served with then-cardinal on board of relatively unknown ecumenical foundation By Knut Royce and Tom Brune, Washington (Newsday) April 21, 2005 Neil Bush, the president’s controversial younger brother, six years ago joined the cardinal who this week became Pope Benedict XVI as a founding board member of a little known Swiss ecumenical foundation. The charter members of the board were all well-known international religious figures, except for Bush and his close friend and business partner, Jamal Daniel, whose family has extensive holdings in the United States and Switzerland, public records show. The Foundation for Interreligious and Intercultural Research and Dialogue was founded in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1999 to promote ecumenical understanding and publish original religious texts, said a foundation official. Besides then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, founding board members included Rene-Samuel Sirat, the former chief rabbi of France; Jordan’s Prince Hassan, a Muslim dedicated to religious dialogue; the late Prince Sadruddin Aga Khan, another prominent Muslim; Olivier Fatio, director of the Institute of the History of the Reformation; and foundation president Metropolitan Damaskinos, a Greek Orthodox leader. Gary Vachicouras, a theologian and foundation official in Geneva, would not explain in a telephone interview yesterday why Bush, who has no clear public connection to religious causes, was on the first board… In his highly publicized divorce last year, Bush revealed he and Daniel are co-chairs of Texas-based Crest Investment Co., which pays him $60,000 a year for consulting. Recently, Crest Investment officials used Bush’s name as a reference in cutting an exclusive deal with Texas officials on construction of a liquid natural gas storage facility that will guarantee Crest payments of at least $2 million a year, according to the Los Angeles Times… The foundation, based at the Orthodox Center of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Geneva, is listed by Dun & Bradstreet business credit reports as a management trust for purposes other than education, religion, charity or research… Fatio, who left the board three years ago, said the foundation “never had any money.” Vachicouras declined to discuss finances.

Pope seeks immunity over sex abuse suit (The Associated Press, The Sydney Morning Herald) 17 Aug 2005 Lawyers for Pope Benedict XVI have asked US President [sic] George W. Bush to declare the pontiff immune from liability in a lawsuit that accuses him of conspiring to cover up the molestation of three boys by a seminarian in Texas, court records show. The Vatican’s embassy in Washington sent a diplomatic memo to the State Department on May 20 requesting the US government grant the pope immunity because he is a head of state, according to a May 26 motion submitted by the pope’s lawyers in US District Court for the Southern Division of Texas in Houston. Joseph Ratzinger is named as a defendant in the civil lawsuit. Now Benedict XVI, he’s accused of conspiring with the Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston to cover up the abuse during the mid-1990s. The suit is seeking unspecified monetary damages. In Washington, US State Department spokeswoman Gerry Keener, said today that the pope already is considered a head of state and automatically has diplomatic immunity. Keener said Benedict doesn’t have to ask for immunity and Bush doesn’t have to grant it.

U.S. Government Says Pope Immune from Lawsuit By Nicole Winfield, Rome (The Associated Press, carried in Fort Worth Star-Telegram) 20 Sep 2005 The U.S. Justice Department has told a Texas court that a lawsuit accusing Pope Benedict XVI of conspiring to cover up the sexual molestation of three boys by a seminarian should be dismissed because the pontiff enjoys immunity as head of state of the Holy See. Assistant U.S. Attorney General Peter Keisler said in Monday’s filing that allowing the lawsuit to proceed would be “incompatible with the United States’ foreign policy interests.” There was no immediate ruling from Judge Lee Rosenthal of the U.S. District Court for the southern district of Texas in Houston. However, U.S. courts have been bound by such “suggestion of immunity” motions submitted by the government, Keisler’s filing says. A 1994 lawsuit against Pope John Paul II, also filed in Texas, was dismissed after the U.S. government filed a similar motion.

Pope ‘led cover-up of child abuse by priests’ (London Evening Standard) 30 Sep 2006 The Pope played a leading role in a systematic cover-up of child sex abuse by Roman Catholic priests, according to a shocking documentary to be screened by the BBC tonight. In 2001, while he was a cardinal, he issued a secret Vatican edict to Catholic bishops all over the world, instructing them to put the Church’s interests ahead of child safety. The document recommended that rather than reporting sexual abuse to the relevant legal authorities, bishops should encourage the victim, witnesses and perpetrator not to talk about it. And, to keep victims quiet, it threatened that if they repeat the allegations they would be excommunicated.

Catholic Cardinal rejects sex abuse ‘gossip’ (BBC) 04 Apr 2010 A senior cardinal has said the Roman Catholic faithful will not be swayed by “petty gossip” about child sex-abuse allegations. Cardinal Angelo Sodano, dean of the College of Cardinals, made the remark in an unusual message of support to Pope Benedict XVI during Easter Mass. The Pope did not mention the scandal directly in his Easter address. He said humanity was suffering from a “profound crisis” and needed “spiritual and moral conversion”.

Pope Accused of Protecting Paedophile Priest 10 Apr 2010 The Pope has been accused of refusing to throw out a paedophile priest so he could protect the reputation of the Catholic church. In a letter written before becoming Pope, the then cardinal Joseph Ratzinger said any action would have “grave significance”. The correspondence is the strongest challenge yet to the Vatican’s insistence that Benedict played no role in blocking the removal of paedophile priests. He was head of the Catholic Church’s doctrinal watchdog office at the time. [Resign now, Rat b*stard.]

Future pope stalled East Bay pedophile priest case 09 Apr 2010 The future Pope Benedict XVI resisted pleas to defrock a California priest with a record of sexually molesting children, citing concerns including “the good of the universal church,” according to a 1985 letter bearing his signature. The correspondence, obtained by The Associated Press, is the strongest challenge yet to the Vatican’s insistence that Benedict played no role in blocking the removal of pedophile priests during his years as head of the Catholic Church’s doctrinal watchdog office.

Pope faces ‘arrest campaign’ in UK 12 Apr 2010 Two activists have called for the arrest of Pope Benedict XVI during his upcoming visit to Britain. Atheist campaigner Richard Dawkins and author Christopher Hitchens have asked human rights lawyers to file a lawsuit against the head of the Catholic Church over his alleged cover-up of sexual abuse in the church, British newspapers reported.

Richard Dawkins calls for arrest of Pope Benedict XVI 11 Apr 2010 Richard Dawkins, the atheist campaigner, is planning a legal ambush to have the Pope arrested during his state visit to Britain “for crimes against humanity”. Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, the atheist author, have asked human rights lawyers to produce a case for charging Pope Benedict XVI over his alleged cover-up of sexual abuse in the Catholic church.


%d bloggers like this: