WHO IS Paul, Cain, Romney, Perry & Gingrich ?

WHO IS RON PAUL ???

WHO’S YOUR REPUBLICAN DADDY ???

The US Military Soldier’s #1 Choice for Republican President for 2012 is RON PAUL 2012 !!! DO YA THINK THEY MIGHT BE QUALIFIED TO MAKE A WARS STATEMENT OF CHOICE WITH THEIR BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN THE WARS ???

The Golden State Band – Bombs (End This War/The Ron Paul Song)

WHO IS RON PAUL LINKS:

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/?s=Ron+Paul+2012+/a>


Ron Paul 2012

FIXING THE POLLS AND POLLING FRAUD AGAIN !!!

Allen,

Just how obvious does your PROPAGANDA MACHINE have to be before We The People simply CONTINUE to turn your channel OFF COMPLETELY ???

Allen Wastler, managing director at CNBC, is the man responsible for taking down the CNBC poll, which as of an hour ago, showed Ron Paul winning at 83%. His lame excuse is that it was ‘gamed’ by rabid Ron Paul supporters. Gamed? WTF does that mean? There was no cheating, there are just ALOT of awake people who love and care about their country. You can write to this NWO dunce here: awastler@mac.com

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/who-won-cnbc-presidential-debate-poll/

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/fox-tv-news-media-blacks-out-ron-paul-in-poll/

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/11/04/this-is-what-presidential-poll-media-manipulation-propaganda-fraud-looks-like/

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/lies-2/

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2011/11/09/who-won-the-iowa-straw-poll/

Daniel Parkman

POLL REMOVED !!! Who Won CNBC Presidential Debate POLL ???

Allen Wastler, managing director at CNBC, is the man responsible for taking down the CNBC poll, which as of an hour ago, showed Ron Paul winning at 83%. His lame excuse is that it was ‘gamed’ by rabid Ron Paul supporters. Gamed? WTF does that mean? There was no cheating, there are just ALOT of awake people who love and care about their country. You can write to this NWO dunce here: awastler@mac.com

Ron Paul 2012

Fox TV News Media Blacks Out Ron Paul in POLL !!!

FAIR & BALANCED ??? SO VOTE FOR OTHER = RON PAUL !!!!

VOTE HERE NOW LINK: http://live.foxnews.com//a>

MAIN STREAM MEDIA BIAS MAKES IT PRETTY OBVIOUS !!!! PROPAGANDA ! SPIN !


BILL O’REILLY DISQUALIFIED ROM PAUL – AFTER RON PAUL WON BILL’S POLL !!!

Ron Paul 2012 –

This is what Presidential Poll Media Manipulation Propaganda Fraud Looks Like !!!!

Ron Paul 2012 – MSNBC Herman Cain et al – Mass Main Stream Media Manipulation – Brain Washing – Secrets Agenda – Propaganda – Mind Control – Ignorance – Deceptions – Hypnotize – Illusions – Psychological Warfare – PsyOps –


A few of the things I have learned in the last 3 years about myself and others that support Ron Paul and the liberty message:

1. We wont be told what to do – doesn’t matter WHO is doing the telling.

2. We wont blindly follow a leader – no matter what the MASSES are doing.

3. We don’t like to be called followers – maybe because we prefer to blaze our own paths.

4. The word ‘leader’ is not one used lightly – maybe because we recognize that leaders mislead.

5. We don’t accept that things cannot be changed – maybe because we believe in our resolve and know that anything is possible.

6. We don’t accept for truth what we don’t find ourselves to be true – maybe because we now see all the lies.

7. We are a difficult bunch to organize – maybe because we are all individuals, refer back to number 1.

8. We wont give up – maybe because we realize what is at stake.

9. WE believe – because we see.

The establishment base, candidates, news media….they just cannot understand this, what makes us this way….it seems within us all, no matter how individual we remain, there is a unified and inherent desire to be free and not ruled.

THIS is WHY we will win.

Ron Paul or NONE at all!

by Lisa Michelle Martin

WHO IS HERMAN CAIN ???

This is what Presidential Poll Media Manipulation Propaganda Fraud Looks Like !!!!

Ron Paul 2012 – MSNBC Herman Cain et al – Mass Main Stream Media Manipulation – Brain Washing – Secrets Agenda – Propaganda – Mind Control – Ignorance – Deceptions – Hypnotize – Illusions – Psychological Warfare – PsyOps –

WHO CAN YOU TRUST ????

Ron Paul 2012 – Mitt Romney – Newt Gingrich


Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy

Wouldn’t it be great if the first thing people asked themselves about their candidate is “Which one would I allow to watch my kids if I had to pick?”.

So who can you trust? The guy who lies openly? The guy who cheats openly? Or the guy who get’s openly attacked for being honest while defending the Constitution and Liberty? Hmmmm? Isn’t it time to put Principles back Over Party?

——————————————————————————–­-
Originally titled “All of this talk is just talk” by ClackForRonPaul. http://www.youtube.com/user/ClackForRonPaul – Please go subscribe to his page and tell him Great Work!

WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW, REVOLUTION BECOMES OUR? DUTY!” -THOMAS JEFFERSON

Let Peace Win! Restore America Now – Ron Paul 2012
——————————————————————————–­-
Are you a Ron Paul supporter but not big on affiliating with the GOP or Tea Party? Please check out “The Ron Party” group on Facebook:

The Ron Party is a place for people who believe Ron Paul is the best chance we have to restore constitutionality in America to rally around him under one name that cannot be confused or condemned for being anything other than what it states. The Ron Party is intended to create separation from the NeoCon Republican Party and Infiltrated “Tee” Party. We intend to help others see the clear choice to save the Republic by exposing the Establishment and it’s tactical control of both political parties. In a sense our mission is to create real choice by driving home the differences between Ron Paul and the Establishment Left Right.

We can make a difference and we can tip the scales back in the peoples favor. We can bring this subversive take over of our country to a halt and serve justice to those who are bankrupting our country, murdering innocents in our name, and turning the world against us with relentless empire building via the military industrial complex. All revolutions are won in the heart and the mind. We’ll be there to make sure people have a chance to hear the message clearly and with the political intelligence to understand the results of their choices.

——————————————————————————–­-
Are you a Ron Paul supporter but not big on affiliating with the GOP or Tea Party? Please check out “The Ron Party” group on Facebook:

The Ron Party is a place for people who believe Ron Paul is the best chance we have to restore constitutionality in America to rally around him under one name that cannot be confused or condemned for being anything other than what it states. The Ron Party is intended to create separation from the Neocon Republican Party and Infiltrated “Tee” Party. We intend to help others see the clear choice to save the Republic by exposing the Establishment and it’s tactical control of both political parties. In a sense our mission is to create real choice by driving home the differences between Ron Paul and the Establishment Left Right.

We can make a difference and we can tip the scales back in the peoples favor. We can bring this subversive take over of our country to a halt and serve justice to those who are bankrupting our country, murdering innocents in our name, and turning the world against us with relentless empire building via the military industrial complex. All revolutions are won in the heart and the mind. We’ll be there to make sure people have a chance to hear the message clearly and with the political intelligence to understand the results of their choices.

The Ron Party: https://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_104208262998588&ap=1 — This group is an Establishment Left/Right False Paradigm Free Environment. Check us out!

——–

Ron Paul is America’s leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, a return to sound monetary policies, and a sensible pro-America foreign policy.

For more information visit the following websites:

http://www.RonPaul.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.net
http://www.LibertyPAC.com
http://www.RonPaulNews.com
http://www.CampaignForLiberty.com
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.DailyPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulForums.com
http://ronpaul2012.podbean.com

Ron Paul – Mitt Romney – Newt Gingrich

WHO IS HERMAN CAIN ???

This is what WAR CRIMINAL Henry Kissinger’s friend Herman Cain Looks Like !!!

HERMAN CAINS 999 PLAN RAISES TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS AND POOR PEOPLE, I DID THE MATH, SEE THE ATTACHED NUMBERS!

It seems it is difficult for some Americans to do the math, THIS IS OUR WEAKNESS, WE BELIEVE EVERYTHING ON TV WITH OUR VERIFICATION, the same way the people allowed the banks to sell them money they could not pay back. Herman Cain, is using the same gimmicks. He is throwing 3 small numbers at the American people and they ASSUME he is helping them with out verification. He truly is a circus act from the Don King tent. 999 is a gimmick. Its uses the same principals of marketing that retails stores use when they price something at $9.99 vs $10.000…..LIKE PIZZA !!!

999 = 666 !!!

9% + 9% + 9% = 27% ++

Who is Herman Cain, former Chairman and Member of the Board of Directors for the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, flippantly denies the need to Audit the Federal Reserve while hosting the Neil Boortz Radio Show on 12/29/10

https://2012patriot.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/fed-ponzi//a>

On Koch Supported Herman Cain
Economic Policy Journal
March 1, 2011

I’ve noticed that Herman Cain, who is already an announced candidate for president, seems to have a close association with the Koch brothers. He attended the recent Koch conference in Rancho Mirage and he has been a speaker at the Koch-funded rightonline.

I have seen clips of him speak, but never anything of substance. He sure can deliver a speech though (see below). So I was excited to see that he was going to appear on Eliot Spitzer’s CNN show last night. True to form he gave one hell of a performance. Lot’s of talk about cutting government down to size (all generalities though), and he threw out the fact that he was a former exec at Pillsbury and CEO of Godfather’s Pizza for 10 years. But then Spitzer zeroed in. He asked Cain about the war in Iraq. Cain said he supported it because, get this, Saddam was using weapons of mass destruction against his own people. Cain also said that he was in favor of food stamps (Though the program needs to cut out fraud). It also sounds like Cain is in favor of some kind of “fair tax”, whatever that is.

And, oh yeah, he’s a former chairman (1995-96) and deputy chairman (1992-94) of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

http://www.voteronpaul.com/newsDetail.php?Who-is-Herman-Cain-3328/a>

Actual 1976 List link:
http://www.lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-Life/HowRothschildFamilyControlsFED/ImageFiles/chart1.png/a>

http://www.apfn.net/doc-100_bankruptcy27.htm/a>

Herman Cain’s Enron-esque Disaster

The story the GOP presidential candidate won’t tell you about his years in corporate America.

—By Andy Kroll
Mon May. 23, 2011 3:00 AM PDT

What GOP presidential contender Herman Cain lacks in political experience, he likes to say, he makes up for with decades’ worth of success in corporate America. He climbed the corporate ladder at the Pillsbury Company, chaired the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, and rescued the failing Godfather’s Pizza franchise. That business-centric message has won Cain his share of admirers: a focus group convened after a recent Fox News presidential debate overwhelmingly declared Cain the winner.

“I think that over 40 years of business experience is resonating a lot more with people than simply having political experience,” he said on a recent Iowa visit. “Knowing how Washington works isn’t necessarily an advantage. As a businessman going in, I don’t want to know how Washington works. I want to change Washington D.C. and so by not knowing how it is supposed to work I can ask tough questions that will help change the culture.”

Cain clearly believes that his pro-business message is what GOP voters want to hear. So much so, in fact, that on Saturday he officially unveiled his candidacy for the 2012 GOP nomination. But scrubbed from Cain’s official story is his long tenure as a director at a Midwest energy corporation named Aquila that, like the infamous Enron Corporation, recklessly dove into the wild west of energy trading and speculation—and ultimately screwed its employees out of tens of millions of dollars.

Advertise on MotherJones.com

According to five lawsuits filed in federal court in 2004, Aquila’s board of directors—which Cain joined in 1992—allegedly steered employees into heavily investing their retirement savings in company stock. At the same time, the company shifted its business model from straightforward energy generation to risky energy trading, an unregulated market made infamous by now-defunct Enron. The suits, later folded into a single, massive class action (PDF), alleged that Cain and top company officials violated a 37-year-old federal law requiring that employers manage employees retirement programs responsibly. (Cain’s presidential exploratory committee did not respond to a request for comment.)

Founded in 1917 as Green Light and Power, Aquila traditionally made its money operating electric and gas plants and selling the energy they produced. In the years after Cain joined the board, Aquila’s earnings climbed, from $254 million in 1995 to $351 million in 1998. Then, in early 1999, the company’s leadership decided running power plants wasn’t lucrative enough; energy trading and speculation had grown popular, and as the class suit lays out, Aquila wanted a piece of the action.

It was a dangerous move—as a company spokesman later put it, “the risk was huge.” In the end, it proved disastrous. Aquila’s decision to join Enron, Reliant Energy, and the other heavy-hitters in the energy trading markets would ultimately wipe out 94 percent of Aquila’s stock value between 1999 and 2004. The company also faced criticism for using some of the same trading tricks that Enron did as a way to puff up its stock price, the lawsuit says. That included using “roundtrip” trades, a scheme in which Aquila would sell a trading partner some energy and then that partner would sell the same amount back to Aquila, a deal that canceled itself out. In the end, nothing actually changed hands. But it boosted Aquila’s trading volume and revenue, sending a positive signal to the markets. The company also engaged in megawatt laundering, or “ricochet” trading, the lawsuit alleges. In such transactions, Aquila and other companies would buy energy from California at a lower capped price, move that energy out of the state, then re-sell it back to California at a higher price for a tidy profit.

But this financial trickery couldn’t save a listing ship. In 2002, Aquila teetered on the brink of collapse. And for Aquila’s employees, the result of the company’s foray into energy trading was devastating: The company’s employee retirement fund, overseen by the board of directors, lost more than $200 million in 2002. The reason: At the same time Aquila’s executives and directors were investing more and more in highly risky energy speculation, they were selling their employees on the conservative nature of Aquila and pushing them to invest their retirement savings in company stock.

For years, the lawsuit says, executives urged employees in company speeches to reinvest in Aquila, lauded those who did so as “Aquila partners,” and even offered a 15 percent discount to buy company stock. Executives and board members also made it more difficult to sell off company stock by implementing lock-up periods, during which employees couldn’t cash in their holdings. At the end of 2000, 85 percent of Aquila employees owned common stock in the company. What’s more, 60 percent of the employees’ retirement fund consisted of Aquila stock—even though financial experts say that total should never be more than 10 to 20 percent.

The spectacular failure of Aquila’s trading venture practically wiped out the hard-earned retirement savings of veteran employees. Richard Itteilag, a plaintiff in the Aquila class action, lost 87 percent of his savings. Robert Goodson, a 20-year Aquila employee, lost 75 percent. Michael Reinhardt lost a staggering 94 percent. All told, thousands of employees saw their retirement funds eviscerated thanks to Aquila’s Enron-esque activities. (In 2007, Aquila settled with the employees for $10.5 million. Not long after, Aquila merged with other Midwestern energy companies and now no longer operates as Aquila.)

Cain served on the board of directors throughout Aquila’s ill-fated trading misadventure and the subsequent collapse of the company’s retirement fund. In fact, he chaired the board’s compensation committee, which, according to the lawsuit, had direct oversight of the push to get employees to invest more and more in Aquila stock. As chair of the compensation committee, Cain also saw fit to dole out $30 million in bonuses, not including stock options, to the top five execs at Aquila in 2002, with the company’s stock plummeting. A month after the Kansas City Star reported on the hefty bonuses in July 2002, the company laid off 500 employees, and the losses to employees holding company stock had reached hundreds of millions of dollars.

As a board member, Cain would’ve had direct knowledge of Aquila’s activities, says Fred Taylor Isquith, a New York attorney who litigated the employee class action. Asked if it was fair to place blame on Cain for the debacle at Aquila, Isquith replied, “Yes, I believe it is.”

US – Fiat – Fed – IMF – Central Banks – World Banks – Private Banks – Rothschilds – 13 families – money – currency – JP Morgan – Jekyll Island – gold – silver – congress – coinage act – Who owns the Federal Reserve System –

WHO IS MITT ROMNEY ???

Ron Paul 2012 – Mitt Romney – Newt Gingrich


Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy

Wouldn’t it be great if the first thing people asked themselves about their candidate is “Which one would I allow to watch my kids if I had to pick?”.

So who can you trust? The guy who lies openly? The guy who cheats openly? Or the guy who get’s openly attacked for being honest while defending the Constitution and Liberty? Hmmmm? Isn’t it time to put Principles back Over Party?

——————————————————————————–­-
Originally titled “All of this talk is just talk” by ClackForRonPaul. http://www.youtube.com/user/ClackForRonPaul – Please go subscribe to his page and tell him Great Work!

WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW, REVOLUTION BECOMES OUR? DUTY!” -THOMAS JEFFERSON

Let Peace Win! Restore America Now – Ron Paul 2012
——————————————————————————–­-
Are you a Ron Paul supporter but not big on affiliating with the GOP or Tea Party? Please check out “The Ron Party” group on Facebook:

The Ron Party is a place for people who believe Ron Paul is the best chance we have to restore constitutionality in America to rally around him under one name that cannot be confused or condemned for being anything other than what it states. The Ron Party is intended to create separation from the NeoCon Republican Party and Infiltrated “Tee” Party. We intend to help others see the clear choice to save the Republic by exposing the Establishment and it’s tactical control of both political parties. In a sense our mission is to create real choice by driving home the differences between Ron Paul and the Establishment Left Right.

We can make a difference and we can tip the scales back in the peoples favor. We can bring this subversive take over of our country to a halt and serve justice to those who are bankrupting our country, murdering innocents in our name, and turning the world against us with relentless empire building via the military industrial complex. All revolutions are won in the heart and the mind. We’ll be there to make sure people have a chance to hear the message clearly and with the political intelligence to understand the results of their choices.

——————————————————————————–­-
Are you a Ron Paul supporter but not big on affiliating with the GOP or Tea Party? Please check out “The Ron Party” group on Facebook:

The Ron Party is a place for people who believe Ron Paul is the best chance we have to restore constitutionality in America to rally around him under one name that cannot be confused or condemned for being anything other than what it states. The Ron Party is intended to create separation from the Neocon Republican Party and Infiltrated “Tee” Party. We intend to help others see the clear choice to save the Republic by exposing the Establishment and it’s tactical control of both political parties. In a sense our mission is to create real choice by driving home the differences between Ron Paul and the Establishment Left Right.

We can make a difference and we can tip the scales back in the peoples favor. We can bring this subversive take over of our country to a halt and serve justice to those who are bankrupting our country, murdering innocents in our name, and turning the world against us with relentless empire building via the military industrial complex. All revolutions are won in the heart and the mind. We’ll be there to make sure people have a chance to hear the message clearly and with the political intelligence to understand the results of their choices.

The Ron Party: https://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_104208262998588&ap=1 — This group is an Establishment Left/Right False Paradigm Free Environment. Check us out!

——–

Ron Paul is America’s leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, a return to sound monetary policies, and a sensible pro-America foreign policy.

For more information visit the following websites:

http://www.RonPaul.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.net
http://www.LibertyPAC.com
http://www.RonPaulNews.com
http://www.CampaignForLiberty.com
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.DailyPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulForums.com
http://ronpaul2012.podbean.com

Ron Paul – Mitt Romney – Newt Gingrich

Romney & Kennedy Debate 1994

2011 Mitt Romney Declares That He Will Not Be Going After Ben Bernanke Or The Federal Reserve

In case anyone needs one more sign that Mitt Romney is just another shill for the establishment, just check out the two statements by Romney below.

According to Politico, Romney recently told CNBC’s Larry Kudlow that he is not concerned about the Federal Reserve at all….

“I think Ben Bernanke is a student of monetary policy; he’s doing as good a job as he thinks he can do,” Romney said when Kudlow asked what kind of job Bernanke is doing. “I’m not going to spend my time going after Ben Bernanke. I’m not going to spend my time focusing on the Federal Reserve.”

That’s just great. The Republican candidate with perhaps the greatest amount of “establishment support” says that he thinks that Bernanke is doing a good job and he does not plan to spend any time focusing on the Federal Reserve.

So if Romney gets in the Federal Reserve will continue to be able to dish out trillions to their friends without any interference.

WHO IS RICK PERRY ???

RICK PERRY WAS THE D-E-M-O-C-R-A-T THAT CHAIRED AL GORE’S PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN IN TEXAS, PUSHED GARDASIL ON GIRLS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, PROMOTES THE NORTH AMERICAN UNIONS SUPERHIGHWAY, HIRED 40% OF ALL NEW TEXAS HIRES WERE ILLEGAL EMIGRANTS & CAN NOT REMEMBER WHICH 3 FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS HE WANTS TO CLOSE DOWN (WHICH HE STOLE FROM RON PAUL’S 5 FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS RON WANTS TO SHUT DOWN ALONG WITH END/AUDIT THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM RON HAS SPONSORED FOR 30 YEARS)

Pictures Show Perry Physically Intimidating Ron Paul

BILDERBERGER !!!

CHINA TAKES OVER TEXAS! YOU CAN THANK RICK PERRY

Perry’s history as a campaign manager for Al Gore, and his legacy of big government policies such as his support for the Trans Texas Corridor, toll roads owned by foreign companies, and his 1993 advocacy of Hillarycare.

‎”Texas has no donation limits and many of the larger donors to Perry have fared well during his time as governor. According to a study by Texans for Public Justice, a good government organization, more than one fifth of the $83 million that Perry has raised for his gubernatorial campaigns has come from people he appointed to state boards and commissions.”

Rick Perry FACTS:1972 Graduated with a 2.5 GPA from Texas A&M Univ.
1976 Voted for Jimmy Carter for President
1984 At age 34, was elected to the Texas House of Reps as a Democrat from district 64
1986 Re-elected as a Democrat
1988 Re-elected as a Democrat
1988 Co-chaired the Democrat Al Gore campaign in Texas
1989 Flopped from Democrat party to Republican party “I intend to vote the same convictions,” Perry said. “The only difference is there will be an R beside my name.” Star-Telegram

14 Reasons Why Rick Perry Would Be A Really, Really Bad President – Alex Jones Tv

The American Dream
June 21, 2011

Bilderberg favorite Perry Supporters of Texas Governor Rick Perry are not going to like this article at all. Right now, Republicans all over the United States are touting Rick Perry as the “Republican messiah” that is going to come charging in to save America from the presidency of Barack Obama. Many believe that if Rick Perry enters the race, he will instantly become the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012. Perry certainly looks the part and he knows how to give a good speech, but when ordinary Americans all over the country take a hard look at his record, they may not like what they see. The truth is that Rick Perry is a big-time globalist, he has raised taxes and fees in Texas numerous times, he has massively increased the size of government spending and government debt in Texas, he has been trying to ram the Trans-Texas Corridor down the throats of the Texas people and he tried to force young women all over Texas to be injected with the Gardasil vaccine. No, Rick Perry is not going to save America. In fact, he would likely be very, very similar to both Bush and Obama in a lot of ways.

Right now, Rick Perry is trying to portray himself as a “good conservative” so that if he enters the race he will be accepted by Christian conservatives. If Rick Perry did win the Republican nomination, he would have a great chance of winning the general election because he would very much be an “establishment” candidate.

But before Republicans get too excited about Rick Perry, there are a whole lot of things that they should know about him.

The following are 14 reasons why Rick Perry would be a really, really bad president….

#1 Rick Perry is a “big government” politician. When Rick Perry became the governor of Texas in 2000, the total spending by the Texas state government was approximately $49 billion. Ten years later it was approximately $90 billion. That is not exactly reducing the size of government.

#2 The debt of the state of Texas is out of control. According to usdebtclock.org, the debt to GDP ratio in Texas is 22.9% and the debt per citizen is $10,645. In California (a total financial basket case), the debt to GDP ratio is just 18.7% and the debt per citizen is only $9932. If Rick Perry runs for president these are numbers he will want to keep well hidden.

#3 The total debt of the Texas government has more than doubled since Rick Perry became governor. So what would the U.S. national debt look like after four (or eight) years of Rick Perry?

#4 Rick Perry has spearheaded the effort to lease roads in Texas to foreign companies, to turn roads that are already free to drive on into toll roads, and to develop the Trans-Texas Corridor which would be part of the planned NAFTA superhighway system. If you really do deep research on this whole Trans-Texas Corridor nonsense you will see why no American should ever cast a single vote for Rick Perry.

#5 Rick Perry claims that he has a “track record” of not raising taxes. That is a false claim. Rick Perry has repeatedly raised taxes and fees while he has been governor. Today, Texans are faced with significantly higher taxes and fees than they were before Rick Perry was elected.

#6 Even with the oil boom in Texas, 23 states have a lower unemployment rate than Texas does.

Stock up with Fresh Food that lasts with eFoodsDirect (Ad)

A d v e r t i s e m e n t
#7 Back in 1988, Rick Perry supported Al Gore for president. In fact, Rick Perry actually served as Al Gore’s campaign chairman in the state of Texas that year.

#8 Between December 2007 and April 2011, weekly wages in the U.S. increased by about 5 percent. In the state of Texas they increased by just 0.6% over that same time period.

#9 Texas now has one of the worst education systems in the nation. The following is from an opinion piece that was actually authored by Barbara Bush earlier this year….

•  We rank 36th in the nation in high school graduation rates. An estimated 3.8 million Texans do not have a high school diploma.

•  We rank 49th in verbal SAT scores, 47th in literacy and 46th in average math SAT scores.

•  We rank 33rd in the nation on teacher salaries.

#10 Rick Perry attended the Bilderberg Group meetings in 2007. Associating himself with that organization should be a red flag for all American voters.

#11 Texas has the highest percentage of workers making minimum wage out of all 50 states.

#12 Rick Perry often gives speeches about illegal immigration, but when you look at the facts, he has been incredibly soft on the issue. If Rick Perry does not plan to secure the border, then he should not be president because illegal immigration is absolutely devastating many areas of the southwest United States.

http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/14-reasons-why-rick-perry-would-be-…

Texas RLC Sends Out Warning on Rick Perry

By Dave Nalle – August 12, 2011 at 10:41 PM
Don’t Believe the Hype. Meet the Real Rick Perry

Republican Liberty Caucus of Texas Sends Warning to Republicans Nationwide About Perry’s Tax and Spend Record

AUSTIN, TX – Texas Governor Rick Perry may be the flavor of the day for a lot of Republicans, but Texas Republicans who are familiar with his record are a lot less enthusiastic about his presidential run. “Perry has a unique talent for finding new ways to raise taxes and loves to use taxpayer money to subsidize his business cronies,” says Secretary Dave Nalle of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Texas. “His supposed belief in limited government and states rights conveniently disappears whenever it conflicts with the demands of the special interests and corporate cronies who he serves.”

Governor Perry’s record of big government, big spending, big taxing and attacks on the fundamental rights of Texas citizens is a familiar to Texans, but seems to be much less well known to Republicans outside of the state, which may explain his high initial showing in the polls. The Republican Liberty Caucus of Texas is compiling a complete dossier on Perry to share with fellow Republicans outside their state so that they can be informed about what they are being sold in a Perry presidential candidacy.

The file on Perry’s abuses of power, insider deals with cronies and tax and spend policies is thick, but for a start here are what Texas RLC members voted as the top five Perry scandals which GOP primary voters need to know more about:

1. Business Slush Funds: Perry made heavy use of business incentive “slush funds” which used taxpayer dollars to subsidize selected businesses, many of them run by his major campaign contributors. Just two of these funds, the Texas Enterprise Fund and the Texas Emerging Growth fund, spent over $700 million to subsidize businesses to move to Texas or expand operations in Texas, with little evidence that these handouts of taxpayer money produced job or revenue growth anywhere near sufficient to justify the expense. In fact, many of these businesses eventually downsized or relocated long before they had earned the money Perry gave them, or even went bankrupt with $25 million fund dollars like Countrywide Financial. source

2. Toll Roads and Land Seizures Perry has never met a toll road project he wasn’t willing to seize huge amounts of private land for and then give the exclusive management contracts to foreign corporations. Perry’s time in office has set records for eminent domain land seizures – over a million acres have been seized. His toll road projects have confiscated family farms and torn communities apart. Toll roads have been used as a massive off-the-books tax program, taking money from Texas drivers and feeding it to foreign financial interests and management groups which lobbied the governor for special deals which produce much higher tolls and higher profits than are typical in other states. source

3. Forced Vaccinations: In 2007 Perry issued an executive order which would have forcibly vaccinated every girl in Texas entering the sixth grade with Merck’s Gardasil vaccine for Human Papilloma Virus. This massive violation of the privacy rights of Texas teenagers and their parents would have come at a cost of $360 in taxpayer money per shot. It would have been a huge windfall for Merck, which had paid Perry’s former Chief of Staff $250,000 to lobby the governor and legislature to promote the forced vaccination program. source

4. The Job-Killing Franchise Tax: Knowing that it would be impossible to pass an income tax against popular opposition in Texas, Perry promoted the idea of a special business tax called the “Franchise Tax” which taxes businesses at different arbitrary rates set by the government. This tax expands business taxes to types of businesses which are not taxed in most states and in many cases taxes small businesses more than large corporations they compete with. For example it taxes small car repair shops at double the rate it taxes large dealerships for car repairs. It’s a small business and job killer. source

5. Scuttled the Anti-TSA Bill When Rep. David Simpson led the Texas legislature towards passage of an enormously popular bill (HB1938) to hold the TSA accountable for intrusive searches of airline passengers, Perry played a key role in making sure that the bill was not passed. When the TSA and the Justice Department began pressuring him, although Perry had promised to submit the bill to the special legislative session, he delayed submitting the bill until it was so late in the session that it was virtually impossible to hold the constitutionally mandated votes necessary for passage. That way he could score points with the public for submitting the popular bill while at the same time making sure that it wouldn’t pass. It’s a classic example of Perry’s insincere pandering. source

Don’t be fooled by campaign hype. If Perry says he’ll cut taxes or get government off our back, look up his real record. Look up his past statements. He supported TARP. He supported the bailouts. He was even Al Gore’s Texas campaign manager back in 1988.

A vote for Perry in the Republican primary is a vote for more big government and more taxes and more of the the same deficits and irresponsibility we had for 12 years under Bush and Obama. The Republican Party and the nation need real leadership, not more of the same with a nicer head of hair.

RLC of Texas Chairman Judson Vandiver asks, “Let’s hope Republicans outside Texas see through all the hype. Let’s all say to to Perry what he said to a Texas state trooper when he tried to bully her after she pulled him over for speeding YouTube: ‘Why don’t you just let us get on down the road?’”

Perry’s Trail of Corruption

September 16, 2011 admin

By Ralph Forbes –

Picture the Marlboro Man riding out of the west, healthy, rugged and free . . . until you recall two of the iconic Marlboro men, Wayne McLaren and David McLean, died of lung cancer. Ironically, McLaren testified in favor of anti-smoking legislation, but the phony Madison Avenue icon lives on. But the deadliest Marlboro Man phony ad is the one that portrays politician Rick Perry as a cowboy. The ads are clearly rustling the Reagan brand and marketing it as his own.

Neighbors in his hometown of Paint Creek and Haskell County clearly think Perry is riding to power on a rustled horse with a false brand. Big city Texans agree. Perry has enjoyed lavish perks and travel, paid for by crony capitalists who have funded Perry’s jetting around the world, stays in luxury hotels and resorts, vacations in exclusive Colorado ski towns, expensive sporting events and concerts, at least nine hunting trips, entertainment—even paying the cable bill at the 4,600-square-foot mansion with a heated pool that the taxpayers are paying for—$8,500 a month. As The Houston Chronicle said, Perry’s “a long way from the cotton farm.”

Perry’s acceptance of such perks feeds a corrupt pay-to-play political culture in Texas. His campaign paid $426,000 last year to settle an opponent’s lawsuit alleging it accepted illegal contributions from a top donor.

According to an article by Kenneth P.Vogel in the Washington dailyPolitico, insurance company owner Phil Adams has contributed nearly $290,000 to Perry’s gubernatorial campaigns. Terrabon Inc., a company in which Adams invested, got $2.75 million from the Texas Emerging Technology Fund, a state economic development program overseen by Perry.

Perry’s trips to Israel are examples of his “extravagant lifestyle funded by secretive corporate contributions” which resulted in favors in return. The trip had been organized and partly funded by Irwin Katsof, an international energy financier and Israel backer, who also helped fund a 2007 Perry trip to Israel.

Doug Pitcock, a major Perry campaign contributor, who runs a road building firm that does millions of dollars in business with the state, revealed that he had loaned his plane to the governor to fly to Israel and wanted to donate the cost of the flight—$180,000—to Texas One (a privately funded “public/private partnership designed for economic development in Texas”) as an in-kind tax-deductible contribution.

Perry spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said the 2007 trip spurred the formation of the Texas-Israel Chamber of Commerce and “served as a catalyst to the governor’s support of Texas’s divestment from companies that do business with Iran.”

When Perry announced his run for the presidency in South Carolina, he began his speech: “I’m the product of a place called Paint Creek—doesn’t have a zip code.” (Its zip code is 79521.) He invoked images of his rural school, growing cotton and wheat, his mother sewing his clothes when he went off to college, his Boy Scout troop (No. 48) . . . “It’s a great place to grow up. . . .Wonderful people out there.”

Meanwhile, back on the farm, “I never saw him on a tractor in his life,” said one of Perry’s old neighbors, who requested anonymity. “And I never did see him on a horse.”

It’s no crime not to be a farmer—but it does show lack of character to pretend you are one. Wallar Overton, 72, Perry’s old Boy Scout troop leader, the one who awarded him his Eagle Scout badge, said he likely won’t be voting for him.

When Perry’s birthplace was devastated by a flood in 2004, Perry turned his back on Haskell, according to Haskell’s county judge, David C. Davis.

Don Ballard, the superintendent of the county’s school system, concurred with Davis. “It was pretty bad,” he said. “We lost a bunch of homes around the lake. . . .We had a lot of homes damaged,” but Perry didn’t send “any kind of aid.”

WHO IS NEWT GINGRICH ???

Ron Paul 2012 – Mitt Romney – Newt Gingrich


Newt Gingrich: Serial Hypocrisy

Wouldn’t it be great if the first thing people asked themselves about their candidate is “Which one would I allow to watch my kids if I had to pick?”.

So who can you trust? The guy who lies openly? The guy who cheats openly? Or the guy who get’s openly attacked for being honest while defending the Constitution and Liberty? Hmmmm? Isn’t it time to put Principles back Over Party?

——————————————————————————–­-
Originally titled “All of this talk is just talk” by ClackForRonPaul. http://www.youtube.com/user/ClackForRonPaul – Please go subscribe to his page and tell him Great Work!

WHEN INJUSTICE BECOMES LAW, REVOLUTION BECOMES OUR? DUTY!” -THOMAS JEFFERSON

Let Peace Win! Restore America Now – Ron Paul 2012
——————————————————————————–­-
Are you a Ron Paul supporter but not big on affiliating with the GOP or Tea Party? Please check out “The Ron Party” group on Facebook:

The Ron Party is a place for people who believe Ron Paul is the best chance we have to restore constitutionality in America to rally around him under one name that cannot be confused or condemned for being anything other than what it states. The Ron Party is intended to create separation from the NeoCon Republican Party and Infiltrated “Tee” Party. We intend to help others see the clear choice to save the Republic by exposing the Establishment and it’s tactical control of both political parties. In a sense our mission is to create real choice by driving home the differences between Ron Paul and the Establishment Left Right.

We can make a difference and we can tip the scales back in the peoples favor. We can bring this subversive take over of our country to a halt and serve justice to those who are bankrupting our country, murdering innocents in our name, and turning the world against us with relentless empire building via the military industrial complex. All revolutions are won in the heart and the mind. We’ll be there to make sure people have a chance to hear the message clearly and with the political intelligence to understand the results of their choices.

——————————————————————————–­-
Are you a Ron Paul supporter but not big on affiliating with the GOP or Tea Party? Please check out “The Ron Party” group on Facebook:

The Ron Party is a place for people who believe Ron Paul is the best chance we have to restore constitutionality in America to rally around him under one name that cannot be confused or condemned for being anything other than what it states. The Ron Party is intended to create separation from the Neocon Republican Party and Infiltrated “Tee” Party. We intend to help others see the clear choice to save the Republic by exposing the Establishment and it’s tactical control of both political parties. In a sense our mission is to create real choice by driving home the differences between Ron Paul and the Establishment Left Right.

We can make a difference and we can tip the scales back in the peoples favor. We can bring this subversive take over of our country to a halt and serve justice to those who are bankrupting our country, murdering innocents in our name, and turning the world against us with relentless empire building via the military industrial complex. All revolutions are won in the heart and the mind. We’ll be there to make sure people have a chance to hear the message clearly and with the political intelligence to understand the results of their choices.

The Ron Party: https://www.facebook.com/home.php?sk=group_104208262998588&ap=1 — This group is an Establishment Left/Right False Paradigm Free Environment. Check us out!

——–

Ron Paul is America’s leading voice for limited, constitutional government, low taxes, free markets, a return to sound monetary policies, and a sensible pro-America foreign policy.

For more information visit the following websites:

http://www.RonPaul.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.com
http://www.RonPaul2012.net
http://www.LibertyPAC.com
http://www.RonPaulNews.com
http://www.CampaignForLiberty.com
http://www.house.gov/paul
http://www.DailyPaul.com
http://www.RonPaulForums.com
http://ronpaul2012.podbean.com

Ron Paul – Mitt Romney – Newt Gingrich


NEWT GINGRICH’S INFIDELITY TO HIS WIFE AND MARRIAGE ! WHO ALSO RECEIVED $300,000…..OOOPS $1.6 MILLION FROM FANNIE MAE & FREDDIE MAC, SUPPORTED, GATT, NAFTA, WTO, TARP, GLOBAL WARMING & CARBON TAXES !!!

It’s amazing how fast these “conservatives” forget that Newt Gingrich left his wife who was dying of cancer, married a 2nd woman, cheated on her, and then married the woman he was having the affair with. I believe this scandal is what prevented him from running in 2008. It’s amazing how quickly people forget!

25 Solid Reason’s why Newt Gingrich can’t win (Share!)
Submitted by emptyeternity on Wed, 11/09/2011 – 19:06
in
Ron Paul 2012
12
votes
– Voted for the creation of the Federal Dept. of Education in 1979 under Jimmy Carter.
– Big supporter of Foreign Aid — even to Soviets through the Export-Import Bank.
– In one year (1994-1995) Gingrich voted for nearly $45 billion in foreign aid.
– He helped push through Federally-funded loan guarantees to Communist China.
– Urged the House to repeal the War Powers Act and give the Presidency more power.
– Urged Clinton to expand military presence in Bosnia.
– Supports Afghan War
– Supports Iraq War
– Calls for Iran War
– Supported Clinton’s welfare programs, education programs, labor programs, and environmental programs, as well as most of his foreign affairs programs.
– Supported spending $30B for the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 that shackled gun owners with new restrictions, federalized a number of crimes, and handed the feds police powers that the Constitution reserves to the states.
– Voted to give billions of dollars to United Nations “peacekeeping” operations;
– Pushed for a School Prayer Amendment
– Mentored by Henry Kissinger
– Bailed out savings and loan institutions in 1991. $40B Bank bailout
– He was a draft-dodger during Vietnam, yet advocates foreign interventionism in his political career.
– Worked on the Rockefeller presidential campaign in 1968.
– Card-Carrying member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a globalist think tank
– “Distinguished member” of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (neocon, pro-interventionism group)
– Member of Bohemian Grove
– Member of the World Future Society
– Voted for NAFTA, a blatant circumvention of Congress’ exclusive power to regulate commerce with foreign nations. Took power from American people and put it into the hands of unelected Binational panels, made mostly of foreigners.
– Supported GATT
– Supported WTO
– Continually supported increased federal spending.

Newt Gingrich supported GATT, NAFTA and WTO while in Congress.

Posted by John Kabitzke on 07/07/10 8:29 PM
Last updated 07/07/10 8:30 PM

[Older: Grassley Responses to Dietary Supplement Safety Act]

Please be informed by reading the following on his broken contract with Americans:

Just as report cards keep parents posted on their children’s progress in school, constituents have a tool to let them know how their federal representatives measure up to their oaths to uphold the Constitution.

We should expect high “grades” from them, because it is not difficult to determine whether legislation oversteps the clearly delineated, limited powers of the Constitution. If there is uncertainty, the Bill of Rights tells the government everything else is off limits. Moreover, an oath calls God as witness to the oath-taker’s honesty and integrity. In other words, it is both illegal and immoral to violate the Constitution. Why are so many Representatives bringing home Fs on their report cards? They may mean well, but a Congressman’s good intentions do not fulfill his obligation before God to vote according to the law.

There are a growing number of candidates for Congress who are running in support of the Constitution. Many of them were motivated to become involved as a result of the political phenomenon in the last presidential race that became known as the “Ron Paul Revolution.” But if the GOP establishment has its way, the Republicans who will go to Washington will be of the neocon variety and will offer voters looking for alternatives to the liberal Democrats more of an echo than a choice. The establishment-favored Newt Gingrich is a case in point.

The Republican?

After more than a decade out of the spotlight, Newt Gingrich is once again making headlines as a conservative author and basking in media speculation of his possibility as a presidential candidate. He is busy promoting his conservatively themed books and documentaries while touting firm belief in limited government and personal freedoms. Gingrich’s rhetoric brings back memories of his old days as a staunch proponent of cutting taxes, balancing the budget, reducing bureaucratic regulations, and strengthening national defense.

Just as in those days, Newt Gingrich now positions himself as a conservative. But does his definition of conservative mean loyalty to the Constitution, or loyalty to the establishment? “Understanding the real Newt Gingrich … is essential,” said John F. McManus, president of the John Birch Society and producer of the new DVD The Real Newt Gingrich. “Americans must realize that they are being persuaded to follow false leaders, to put confidence in men who don’t deserve our confidence.” Both Gingrich’s congressional track record and his present activities prove him no better than the current White House occupant.

Gingrich Resumé

Newt Gingrich served in Congress from 1979 until 1999. His first Freedom Index score (when it was known as the “Conservative Index”) was 84, but it nose-dived from there. He achieved his lowest scores as Speaker of the House. Gingrich consistently lost points for his propensity to support unconstitutional legislation.

1. Education – Gingrich backed federal education funding from his earliest days in office, though the Constitution gives absolutely no authority over education to any branch of the federal government. He helped garner support to create President Jimmy Carter’s Department of Education in 1979. Since then educational spending has soared while educational standards have plummeted. Things got worse when he was Speaker. In 1996, then-Republican Party Chairman Haley Barbour bragged that “education spending went up under the Republican Congress as much as it went up under the Democratic Congress.” That is a bit of an understatement since Gingrich’s Republican Congress increased education funding by $3.5 billion in 1996, the largest single increase in history.

2. Foreign Aid – Gingrich voted numerous times throughout his 20 years in Congress to increase and expand unconstitutional foreign aid and trade. He supported both subsidized trade with the Soviets and federally funded loans to foreign governments through the Export-Import Bank. Between 1994 and 1995, Gingrich voted for $44.8 billion in foreign aid. He also helped push through federally funded loan guarantees to China. Today, that murderous communist regime is the largest holder of U.S. debt in the world.

3. NAFTA, GATT, WTO – In 1993, Gingrich proved himself invaluable to Clinton and the Democrats in Congress when he garnered enough Republican support to pass the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the precursor for development of an eventual North American Union, following the same trajectory that has occurred in Europe with the emergence of the EU. (See the October 15, 2007 “North American Union” issue of The New American, especially “NAFTA: It’s Not Just About Trade” by Gary Benoit.) The next year he followed suit by supporting the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO). As Minority Whip, he could have postponed the lame-duck vote on GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) that subjected Americans to the WTO. Gingrich’s Benedict Arnold act helped to hand over the power to regulate foreign commerce, a power reserved in the Constitution to Congress alone, to an internationally controlled body, making America’s economic interests entirely at the mercy of the WTO.

Gingrich knew GATT sounded the death knell for American sovereignty. In testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee prior to the lame-duck session, he said, “We need to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States at a practical level significant authority to a new organization…. This is not just another trade agreement. This is adopting something which twice, once in the 1940s and once in the 1950s, the U.S. Congress rejected…. It is a very big transfer of power.”

4. Contract With America – Another con-game Gingrich played was the much-acclaimed “Contract With America,” the Republican Party’s supposed answer to big government. It turned out to be a public relations smokescreen to cover various unconstitutional measures that Congress planned to pass under Gingrich’s leadership. The Contract included a “balanced budget amendment,” which amounted to a Republican excuse to continue spending while claiming to fight for fiscal conservatism. If the government only spent money on constitutional programs, the deficit would take care of itself.

Other areas of the Contract With America dealt with measures to reduce welfare programs and relieve tax burdens on families and businesses. That sounds good until one considers that the Constitution prohibits welfare programs and taxes that the Contract proposed only to reduce. If Gingrich had been loyal to his oath of office, he would have worked not to trim but to purge them. Ironically, but hardly surprisingly, federal spending in all the areas addressed by the 1994 Contract rose in subsequent years. Edward H. Crane, president of the Cato Institute, observed that “the combined budgets of the 95 major programs that the Contract With America promised to eliminate have increased by 13%.” Crane also pointed out, “Over the past three years the Republican-controlled Congress has approved discretionary spending that exceeded Bill Clinton’s requests by more than $30 billion.”

Another of the problems with the Contract was that it called for stronger federal crime-fighting measures, despite the Constitution’s prohibition on federal involvement in police matters outside of piracy and treason. Countries that do not have such strict constitutional safeguards on federal police end up with Gestapos, KGBs, and Departments of Homeland Security.

5. School Prayer Amendment – The proposed balanced budget amendment was not Gingrich’s only attempt to change the Constitution. He also pushed hard for a school prayer amendment to allow America’s children to pray in schools. It was just another shameless publicity stunt, for Gingrich knows the main obstacle to prayer in schools is not a faulty Constitution but an overambitious Supreme Court. Had he truly wanted to release the federal stranglehold on prayer in schools, Gingrich could have employed Congress’ constitutionally authorized power to restrict the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction of the issue.

6. Clinton’s GOP (Grand Old Pal) – In 1995, Time magazine named Newt Gingrich “Man of the Year,” characterizing him as a states’ rights conservative and the Republican answer to Bill Clinton. The ironic thing about Time magazine’s 1995 claim is that in June of that year, Gingrich and Clinton both agreed at a debate in Clare-mont, New Hampshire, that they were “not far apart” in their views. Later Clinton publicly thanked Gingrich for his support of the President’s pet projects in areas such as welfare, education, labor, the environment, and foreign affairs. He made special mention of Gingrich’s support of the $30 billion Violent Crime and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 that shackled gun owners with new restrictions, federalized a number of crimes, and handed the feds police powers that the Constitution reserves to the states.

On numerous occasions, Gingrich showed himself a friend to Clinton’s military policies, with a flagrant disregard for the constitutional mandate that Congress alone may declare war. He made a formal appeal to the House of Representatives in 1995 to “increase the power of President Clinton” by repealing the War Powers Act. He praised Clinton’s unconstitutional use of the U.S. military to inflict a communist regime on Haiti in 1994, the same year he voted for an extra $1.2 billion for United Nations “peacekeeping” missions. He also urged the President to expand U.S. military presence in Bosnia the following year.

This partial resumé does not include Gingrich’s support of abortion and anti-family measures, federal welfare, a presidential line item veto, the National Endowment for the Arts, confiscation of private property, amnesty for illegal immigrants, higher taxes, and a myriad of other unconstitutional legislation. But it is enough to prove he lied each time took his oath of office. The question is, why this disdain for the rule of law? A close look at Gingrich’s associations provides the answer to why he had such a propensity for claiming conservatism while voting with the establishment.

Futurist

In 1994, Gingrich described himself as “a conservative futurist.” He said that those who were trying to define him should look no further than The Third Wave, a 1980 book written by Alvin Toffler. The book describes our society as entering a post-industrial phase in which abortion, homosexuality, promiscuity, and divorce are perfectly normal, even virtuous. Toffler penned a letter to America’s “founding parents,” in which he said: “The system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented – a democracy for the 21st century.” He went on to describe our constitutional system as one that “served us so well for so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.”

Gingrich recommended The Third Wave as essential reading to his colleagues when he became Speaker of the House. In his forward to another Toffler book, Creating a New Civilization: The Politics of the Third Wave, he grieved at the lack of appreciation for “Toffler’s insight” in The Third Wave and blamed politicians who had not applied his model for the “frustration, negativism, cynicism and despair” of the political landscape. He went on to explain that Toffler advocated a concept called “anticipatory democracy,” and bragged that he had worked with him for 20 years “to develop a future-conscious politics and popular understanding that would make it easier for America to make the transition” to a Third Wave civilization.

The Internationalist

Another explanation for Gingrich’s liberal voting record is that he has been a member, since 1990, of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a group founded in 1921 as a think tank of influential politicians and policymakers dedicated to sacrificing national independence to create a global government. He showed his fidelity to internationalism in a speech at the Center for Strategic and International Affairs in July of 1995 when he brazenly admitted his disdain for our founding document.

“The American challenge in leading the world is compounded by our Constitution,” he said. “Under our [constitutional system] – either we’re going to have to rethink our Constitution, or we’re going to have to rethink our process of decision-making.” He went on to profess an oxymoronic belief in “very strong but limited federal government,” and pledged, “I am for the United Nations.” That is certainly no surprise since his mentor is none other than former Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger (also a CFR member and one-world internationalist).

On other occasions Gingrich expressed his admiration and regard for establishment insiders Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, Dwight D. Eisenhower, and George Catlett Marshall, praising what they had done to bring about international government. Gingrich scorned any connection with “isolationists” (a dirty word used to describe anyone who defines free trade as the ability to conduct international business unfettered by unconstitutional regulations) in a speech given at the Nixon Center for Peace and Freedom on March 1, 1995. He cited his work on NAFTA, GATT, and various foreign aid measures, and concluded saying, “I’m always curious why there’s some presumption that [I am] in any way isolationist.”

Newt and Improved

What about Gingrich today? Isn’t it possible he has changed since he served in Congress? He has a new wife and a new religion, converting to Catholicism earlier this year. He still says he is conservative, but maybe that definition has changed, too. Indeed, he positioned himself as a hero of this past April’s Tax Day Tea Party movement, partnering with that group in his position as chairman of American Solutions for Winning the Future (ASWF). He issued a general invitation to all Americans on YouTube to join local Tea Parties across the nation. “The fact is that we need a smaller government, a more effective government, and we need lower taxes,” he said. “Let’s communicate to our leaders, ‘We want you to fix it, or we’re gonna want new leaders.'” He used even stronger language in a rousing delivery at the April 15 Tea Party in New York, when he warned big-spending legislators to straighten up or “we’re gonna fire you.”

Yet it seems Gingrich is still up to his old tricks. In front of a Tea Party crowd, he expounds the virtues of limited government, but elsewhere he is still the futurist conservative devoted to internationalism. His blog biography brags about his work as Speaker of the House and then boasts of such unconstitutional credentials as serving on the CFR’s Terrorism task force, co-chairing the UN task force to “reform” (i.e., strengthen) the United Nations, and receiving credit for the DHS being his brainchild. “Newt Gingrich is a leading advocate of increased federal funding for basic science research,” reads the bio. Gingrich’s ASWF endorses federal involvement in areas such as energy, education, labor and the environment. He also founded the Center for Health Transformation, which advocates its own version of socialized medicine.

Global Government Gingrich

It would seem the CFR has done a good job schooling Gingrich in foreign affairs over the past 10 years as well. No longer the novice, Gingrich supports continuing the “war” in Afghanistan despite the fact that Congress never actually declared war as required by the Constitution. The Baltimore Sun noted on October 22 that Gingrich supports expanding the U.S. military presence in the Middle East. He claimed, “Afghanistan is a skirmish in a long war…. We need a much larger grand strategy that deals with the whole war.” He even had the audacity to invoke George Washington as a model for Obama in making “morally correct” decisions in Afghanistan. Careful, Gingrich, you’re quoting one of those nasty noninterventionists! Washington had this to say about foreign policy in his Farewell Address: “The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible.” Yet National Review quoted Gingrich in opposition to the Father of Our Country. “You can pull out of Afghanistan, and then what?… We pulled out of Somalia, and now we have pirates,” he said, ignoring what U.S. support of the UN puppet regime in that unfortunate country has done to promote terrorism, and parallel scenarios in Afghanistan and across the Middle East. His statements leave little doubt as to how Gingrich would conduct himself as Commander in Chief.

Little Green Man

But he isn’t all fight. There’s also the kinder, gentler Newt who, in April 2008, cuddled up with current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on a love seat at the National Mall to make a “We Can Solve It” television commercial (for Al Gore’s $300 million global-warming ad campaign) urging constituents to pressure their Representatives in Washington to go green. He said that “our country must take action to address climate change.” Yet when he explained his participation at newt.org, he admitted, “I don’t think that we have conclusive proof of global warming [or] that humans are at the center of it.” This is ludicrous. If Gingrich intends to take a side in the debate, he is de facto conceding that climate change is real and humans are the cause. He is yielding to a false premise, and any “compromise” solution based on it will be disastrous.

Gingrich’s blog explains further, “There is a big difference between left-wing environmentalism … and a Green Conservatism that wants to use science, technology, innovation, entrepreneurs and prizes to find a way to creatively invent the kind of environmental future we all want.” (Emphasis added.) He fails to acknowledge that the Constitution prohibits federal involvement in those areas, but the really troubling word is “prizes.” This has cap and trade written all over it. Gingrich already sanctioned cap and trade on sulfur dioxide emissions in the 1990 Clean Air Act. He claims to oppose Obama’s plan but instead wants the government to lower prices on alternative energy sources, “because I think you’re going to get faster acceleration of new innovation if you lower the price of good products … rather than raise the price of obsolete products.” So Gingrich’s “conservative” answer to the concocted energy crisis is price regulation and government subsidies, both of which use tax money to stifle the economy, giving advantage to faulty products and services that cannot support themselves in a free-market economy. Gingrich’s “Green Conservatism” seems much like the “left-wing environmentalism” that he disapproves.

Education Reform à la Al (Sharpton)

Pelosi and Gore are not Gingrich’s only strange bedfellows. He recently toured the nation with Reverend Al Sharpton and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan to promote President Obama’s education reforms and charter schools. Of course, there are a number of problems with that scenario, not the least of which is Gingrich’s association with Al Sharpton, a controversial left-wing activist, or his contemptible pandering to the dictates of the liberal Obama administration. The main problem, as usual, is Gingrich’s endorsement of patently unconstitutional measures. The tour agenda recommends increased local control of schools to be regulated and subsidized by the federal Department of Education. That’s right: increased local control through increased federal regulation.

The proposal also calls for “the ability of parents to pick the right school for their child.” Parents would already have that ability if it weren’t for the Department of Education. Rearranging how the federal government regulates education may be “reform” of the current system, but the current system is unconstitutional.

Republican to the Oh-so-bitter End

If all this weren’t enough to expose Gingrich’s fidelity-at-all-costs to the establishment, he endorsed an ultra-liberal Republican over a conservative third-party candidate in New York’s 23rd Congressional District special election held November 3. Republican Dede Scozzafava supports same-sex “marriage,” big labor, and abortion. She won the Margaret Sanger Award from Planned Parenthood in March of 2008. The liberal ACORN-affiliated Working Families Party backs Scozzafava, and conservatives within her party call her a RINO (Republican In Name Only). When the New York Post came out in support of her Conservative Party opponent, Doug Hoffman, it said, “a Republican should adhere to certain minimum GOP principles. Scozzafava is just too far to the left too often.” Yet Gingrich described her in a letter to supporters as “our best chance to put responsible and principled leaders in Washington.” Gingrich explained his endorsement on newt.org, saying his “number one interest in the 2009 elections is to build a Republican majority,” and to do so it is sometimes necessary “to put together a coalition that has disagreement within it.” Considering that the publisher of the liberal Daily Kos endorsed Scozzafava as “willing to raise taxes” and “to the left of most Democrats on social issues,” it’s fair to ask if Newt has any principles at all.

Scozzafava dropped a campaign bomb-shell when she withdrew from the race just four days before the election, leaving a two-man fight between Hoffman and Democrat opponent Bill Owens. Gingrich then endorsed Hoffman, not on principle, but to prevent the Democrats from gaining another seat in the House. Owens got an endorsement from Scozzafava the very next day and proceeded to win the election by a narrow plurality. So Republicans lost a seat in the House, and Gingrich lost an enormous amount of credibility among conservatives.

Jekyll and Hyde vs. the Constitution

With outrageous national debt and out-of-control federal spending, loss of sovereignty to the likes of the UN and the WTO, spiraling taxes, and a bloodsucking bureaucratic leviathan, America can no longer afford to gamble on such a Jekyll-and-Hyde “conservative” as Newt Gingrich. What we need in Washington instead are constitutionalists who know that it is against the law to violate the Constitution no matter what anyone’s opinion may be. The easiest way to tell a phony conservative from the true constitutionalist is to ask a few simple questions. Does he support federal education and welfare programs? Foreign aid? An interventionist foreign policy as opposed to staying clear of foreign quarrels? If yes, he is not a constitutionalist. We will never get back to good government unless we urge lawmakers to use the Constitution as their guide, and only support candidates who adopt the Constitution as their platform, regardless of party.

Rebecca Terrell is a marketing representative in Memphis, Tennessee, where she lives with her family. She is a former congressional staffer for Congressman Ron Paul (R-Texas). Rebecca earned a B.B.A. from the University of Arkansas and an M.B.A. from the University of North Alabama.


WHAT IS NEWT GINGRICH’S VOTING RECORD ???

Who is Newt:
04/02/1987 – He cosponsored the 1987 Fairness Doctrine
10/22/1991 – He voted for an amendment that would create a National Police Corps.
03/—/1993 – He Voted for sending $1.6 Billion in foreign aid to Russia.
11/19/1993 – He voted for the NAFTA Implementation Act.
11/27/1994 – He supported the GATT Treaty giving sovereignty to the U.N.
08/27/1995 – He suggests that drug smuggling should carry a death sentence.
04/25/1996 – Voted for the single largest increase on Federal education spending ($3.5 Billion)
04/10/1995 – He supported Federal taxdollars being spent on abortions.
06/01/1996 – He helped a Democrat switch parties in an attempt to defeat constitutionali st Ron Paul in the 1996 election.
09/25/1996 – Introduced H.R. 4170, demanded life-sentence or execution for someone bringing 2 ounces of marijuana across the border.
01/22/1997 – Congress gave him a record-setting $300,000 fine for ethical wrongdoing.
11/29/2006 – He said that free speech should be curtailed in order to fight terrorism. Wants to stop terrorists from using the internet. Called for a “serious debate about the 1st Amendment.”
11/29/2006 – He called for a “Geneva Convention for terrorists” so it would be clear who the Constitution need not apply to.
02/15/2007 – He supported Bush’s proposal for mandatory carbon caps.
09/28/2008 – Says if he were in office, he would have reluctantly voted for the $700B TARP bailout.
10/01/2008 – Says in an article that TARP was a “workout, not a bailout.”
12/08/2008 – He was paid $300,000 by Freddie Mac to halt Congress from bringing necessary reform.
03/31/2009 – Says we should have Singapore-style drug tests for Americans.
07/30/2010 – Says that Iraq was just step one in defeating the “Axis of Evil”.
08/03/2010 – Advocates attacks on Iran & North Korea.
08/16/2010 – Opposes property rights of the mosque owner in NYC.
11/15/2010 – He defended Romneycare
12/05/2010 – He said that a website owner should be considered an enemy combatant, hunted down and executed, for publishing leaked government memos.
01/30/2011 – He lobbied for ethanol subsidies.
01/30/2011 – He suggested that flex-fuel vehicles be mandated for Americans.
02/13/2011 – He criticized Obama for sending less U.S. taxdollars to Egypt.
02/15/2011 – His book said that he believes man-made climate-change and advocated creating “a new endowment for conservation and the environment.”
03/09/2011 – He blames his infidelity to multiple wives on his passion for the country.
03/15/2011 – Says that NAFTA worked because it created jobs in Mexico.
03/19/2011 – He has no regrets about supporting Medicare drug coverage. (Now $7.2T unfunded liability)
03/23/2011 – He completely flip-flopped on Libyan intervention in 16 days.
03/25/2011 – He plans to sign as many as 200 executive orders on his first day as president.
04/25/2011 – He’s a paid lobbyist for Federal ethanol subsidies.
05/12/2011 – He was more supportive of individual health-care mandates than Mitt Romney.
06/09/2011 – His own campaign staff resigned en masse.
07/15/2011 – His poorly managed campaign is over $1 Million in debt.
08/01/2011 – He hired a company to create fake Twitter to appear as if he had a following.
10/07/2011 – He said he’d ignore the Supreme Court if need be.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “WHO IS Paul, Cain, Romney, Perry & Gingrich ?”

  1. David Yerke Says:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vux8ru0HjHQ Think you could add that vid to the ron paul goodies?

  2. US news and politics Says:

    US news and politics…

    […]WHO IS Paul, Cain, Romney, Perry & Gingrich ? « 2012 Patriot[…]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s