Trillion Dollar Crimes

April 21, 2015

Actual One Hundred Trillion Dollars of the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe – I promise to pay to the bearer on demand One Hundred Trillion Dollars for the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe – as is ALL IOU FED CENTRAL BANK FIAT TOILET PAPER “currency” created out of thin air backed by absolutely nothing.

Is this USA End the FED future ? :

$2.3 Trillion then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (FDA Aspartame Poison also) announces one day before 9/11/2001 that the The Military Industrial Complex / Pentagon lost/STOLE $2.3 Trillion. Then on 9/11 the part of the Pentagon that was destroyed by a missile was the records keeping department and poof the problem disappeared.


$15 Trillion Royal Bank of Scotland – British House of Commons – England – 2008 USA TARP

Lord James of Blackheath, House of Lords February 16 2012
Breaking news Lord James of Blackheath has spoken in the House of Lords holding evidence of three transactions of 5 Trillion each and a transaction of 750,000 metric tonnes of gold and has called for an investigation.

I think there are three possible conclusions that may come from it. I think there may have been a massive piece of money laundering committed by a major government which ought to know better and that it has effectively undermined the integrity of the British bank the Royal Bank of Scotland, in doing so. The second alternative is that a major American department has an agency that has gone rogue on it because it has been wound up and has created a structure out of which they are seeking to get at least 50 billion Euros as a payoff. And the third possibility is that this is an extraordinarily elaborate fraud which has not been carried out but which has been prepared in order to provide a threat to one government or more if they don’t pay them off. So there are three possibilities and this all needs a very urgent review.

My Lords, it starts in April and May of 2009, with the alleged transfer to the United Kingdom, to HSBC of a sum of 5 trillion dollars and seven days later, in comes another 5 trillion dollars to HSBC, and then 3 weeks later another 5 trillion. 5 trillion in each case. Sorry. A total of 15 trillion dollars is alleged to have been passed into the hands of HSBC for onward transit to the Royal Bank of Scotland and we need to look at where this came from and what the history of this money is. And I have been trying to sort out the sequence by which this money has been created and from where it has come from for a long time.………


$200 Trillion in UNFUNDED MANDATES, liabilities, pensions, retirements (Not including TARP, Quantitative Easings, DOT Com Bombs, Real Estate Busts, ObamaCare, Illegal Immigrant Amnesty or other NWO manipulations)

US Debt $200 Trillion + Laurence Kotlikoff


$1.2 Quadrillion = $1,200 Trillion

$1.5 Quadrillion = $1,500 Trillion

$700 Trillion in Derivatives, more likely US$ 1,600 Trillion used as collateral for the NWO 1% to manipulate & control global wealth, wars, dot com bomb, real estate collapse, precious metals, governments, nations, natural resources, energy, currencies, food supplies, LIFE & DEATH.

Total outstanding gross market value by 6 month period:

$707,568,901,000,000: How (And Why) Banks Increased Total Outstanding Derivatives By A Record $107 Trillion In 6 Months
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/26/2011 20:44 -0500

AIG American International Group Counterparties Gross Domestic Product Mean Reversion MF Global notional value OTC OTC Derivatives Volatility

While everyone was focused on the impending European collapse, the latest soon to be refuted rumors of a quick fix from the Welt am Sonntag notwithstanding, the Bank of International Settlements reported a number that quietly slipped through the cracks of the broader media. Which is paradoxical because it is the biggest ever reported in the financial world: the number in question is $707,568,901,000,000 and represents the latest total amount of all notional Over The Counter (read unregulated) outstanding derivatives reported by the world’s financial institutions to the BIS for its semi-annual OTC derivatives report titled “OTC derivatives market activity in the first half of 2011.” Said otherwise, for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the total number of outstanding derivatives surged past the previous all time high of $673 trillion from June 2008, and is now firmly in 7-handle territory: the synthetic credit bubble has now been blown to a new all time high. Another way of looking at the data is that one of the key contributors to global growth and prosperity in the past 10 years was an increase in total derivatives from just under $100 trillion to $708 trillion in exactly one decade. And soon we have to pay the mean reversion price.

What is probably just as disturbing is that in the first 6 months of 2011, the total outstanding notional of all derivatives rose from $601 trillion at December 31, 2010 to $708 trillion at June 30, 2011. A $107 trillion increase in notional in half a year. Needless to say this is the biggest increase in history. So why did the notional increase by such an incomprehensible amount? Simple: based on some widely accepted (and very much wrong) definitions of gross market value (not to be confused with gross notional), the value of outstanding derivatives actually declined in the first half of the year from $21.3 trillion to $19.5 trillion (a number still 33% greater than US GDP). Which means that in order to satisfy what likely threatened to become a self-feeding margin call as the (previously) $600 trillion derivatives market collapsed on itself, banks had to sell more, more, more derivatives in order to collect recurring and/or upfront premia and to pad their books with GAAP-endorsed delusions of future derivative based cash flows. Because derivatives in addition to a core source of trading desk P&L courtesy of wide bid/ask spreads (there is a reason banks want to keep them OTC and thus off standardization and margin-destroying exchanges) are also terrific annuities for the status quo. Just ask Buffett why he sold a multi-billion index put on the US stock market. The answer is simple – if he ever has to make good on it, it is too late.

Which brings us to the the chart showing total outstanding notional derivatives by 6 month period below. The shaded area is what that the BIS, the bank regulators, and the OCC urgently hope that the general public promptly forgets about and brushes under the carpet.

Try not to laugh. Or cry. Or gloss over, because when it comes to visualizing $708 trillion most really are incapable of doing so.

Total outstanding gross market value by 6 month period:

There is much more than can be said on this topic, and has to be said, because an increase of that magnitude is simply impossible to perceive without alarm bells going off everywhere, especially when one considers the pervasive deleveraging occurring at every sector but the government. All else equal, this move may well explain the massive surge in bank profitability in the first half of the year. It also means that with banks suffering massive losses, and rumors of bank runs and collateral calls, not to mention the aftermath of the MF Global insolvency, the world financial syndicate will have no choice but to increase gross notional even more, even as the market value continues to get ever lower, thus sparking the risk of the mother of all margin calls: a veritable credit fission reaction.

But no matter what: the important thing to remember is that “they are all hedged” – or so they say, a claim we made a completely mockery of a few weeks back. So ex-sarcasm, the now parabolic increase in derivatives means that when the bilateral netting chain is once again broken, and it will be (because AIG was not a one off event), there will simply be trillions more in derivatives that no longer generate a booked cash flow stream for the remaining counterparty, until at the very end, the whole inverted credit0money pyramid collapses in on itself.

And for those wondering what the distinction is between notional and

Notional amounts outstanding: Nominal or notional amounts outstanding are defined as the gross nominal or notional value of all deals concluded and not yet settled on the reporting date. For contracts with variable nominal or notional principal amounts, the basis for reporting is the nominal or notional principal amounts at the time of reporting.

Nominal or notional amounts outstanding provide a measure of market size and a reference from which contractual payments are determined in derivatives markets. However, such amounts are generally not those truly at risk. The amounts at risk in derivatives contracts are a function of the price level and/or volatility of the financial reference index used in the determination of contract payments, the duration and liquidity of contracts, and the creditworthiness of counterparties. They are also a function of whether an exchange of notional principal takes place between counterparties. Gross market values provide a more accurate measure of the scale of financial risk transfer taking place in derivatives markets.
Well, no. It is logical that the BIS will advise everyone to ignore the bigger number and focus on the small one: just like everyone was told to ignore gross exposure and focus on net… until Jefferies had to dump all of its gross PIIGS exposure or stare bankruptcy in the face; so no – the correct thing to say is “gross market values provide a more accurate measure of the scale of financial risk transfer” if one assumes there is no counterparty risk. Because one the whole bilateral netting chain is broken, net becomes gross. And gross market value becomes total notional outstanding. And, to quote Hudson, it’s game over.

As for the largely irrelevant gross market value, which is only relevant in as much as it will be the catalyst which will precipitate margin calls on the underlying notionals, all $700+ trillion of them:

Gross positive and negative market values: Gross market values are defined as the sums of the absolute values of all open contracts with either positive or negative replacement values evaluated at market prices prevailing on the reporting date. Thus, the gross positive market value of a dealer’s outstanding contracts is the sum of the replacement values of all contracts that are in a current gain position to the reporter at current market prices (and therefore, if they were settled immediately, would represent claims on counterparties). The gross negative market value is the sum of the values of all contracts that have a negative value on the reporting date (ie those that are in a current loss position and therefore, if they were settled immediately, would represent liabilities of the dealer to its counterparties).

The term “gross” indicates that contracts with positive and negative replacement values with the same counterparty are not netted. Nor are the sums of positive and negative contract values within a market risk category such as foreign exchange contracts, interest rate contracts, equities and commodities set off against one another.

As stated above, gross market values supply information about the potential scale of market risk in derivatives transactions. Furthermore, gross market value at current market prices provides a measure of economic significance that is readily comparable across markets and products.
And here again, what they ignore to add is that the measure of economic significance is only relevant in as much as the world’s banks don’t begin a Lehman-MF Global tango of mutual margin call annihilation. In that case, no. They are not measures of anything except for what some banks plug into some models to spit out a favorable EPS treatment at the end of the quarter.

Expect to see gross market value declines persisting even as the now parabolic increase in total notional persists. At this rate we would not be surprised to see one quadrillion in OTC derivatives by the middle of next year.

And, once again for those confused, the fact that notional had to increase so epically as market value tumbled most likely means that the global derivative pyramid scheme (no pun intended) is almost over.

Source: OTC derivatives market activity in the first half of 2011 and Semiannual OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2011


The Trillion Dollar Crime Trial

by Benjamin Fulford September 3, 2010
The operation to flush out the leadership of the dark cabal has now zeroed in on the World Economic Forum at Davos, according to agents involved.
Italian P2 lodge member Daniel Dal Bosco, who has been under complete 24-hour surveillance since absconding with over $1 trillion in financial instruments, has led investigators to Giancarlo Bruno, “Head of the Financial Services Industry” at the World Economic Forum, investigators say.

The latest breakthrough in the ongoing criminal investigation has created a state of extreme tension in Western power corridors, especially Washington and Geneva.

“The world will not be the same when this is over,” a senior CIA source says.

The conversation intercepted between Dal Bosco and Bruno is like something out of a weird spy movie, the investigators say.
It can be paraphrased as follows:

Dal Bosco: “You need to help me, I am being followed by about 30 spaceships.”

Bruno: “I told you never to contact me, no matter what.”

According to investigators there are now more spies than normal citizens in the small Italian town where Dal Bosco is now staying and the pressure is beginning to wear on him. Neither Dal Bosco nor Bruno were available for comment at the time of this writing.

The trail from Bruno leads to the leadership of the United Nations as well as the Obama regime in Washington, the investigators say.

There is a long list of arrest warrants that has been readied and you can be sure a lot of people will be skipping the next Davos meeting out of fear of being arrested.

“The air in Washington is so thick now with tension that you could cut it with a knife,” a White Dragon Society source close to the action in D.C. says.

The tensions and divisions within the secret Western government are leading to ever more “incidents,” reaching the public eye.

In one incident, the body of Yuri Ivanov Deputy Head of GRU was found “accidentally drowned,” last week. He was in Syria helping prevent World War 3 from breaking out in the Middle East.
Then we have the case of MI6 Spy Garreth Williams, who was found stuffed inside a bag in his bathroom. The case is creating thick clouds of disinformation.
Then we have the on-again, off-again rape charges against Julian Assange of Wikileaks.

All these incidents point to deep division between various Western intelligence and police agencies. However, the Italians are looking especially isolated in all this.

In China, meanwhile, factional tensions are also rising with three main factions allying themselves with different factions in the battle for control over the financial system of the West.

There are also three factions in the West battling over the new financial system.

The incumbent faction is the New World Order faction that still hopes to start World War 3 and start a global fascist government.

Against them is the informal alliance that believes control over the world financial system should belong to the people of the planet

A third faction just sits on the fence waiting to ally themselves with the victor.

At the heart of this battle right now is the question of who will control the planned Amero currency.

Preparations for the launch of the Amero are now being finalized. Already the new gold-backed currency has been printed and distributed to the world’s various central banks. The governments of Canada and Mexico have also signed on. Average humans will be able to trade two dollars for one Amero.

see Amero :

see Bancor :

see Bitcoin :

The various countries holding US debt have each been offered their own rate. We do not know the details but have heard the Chinese got the best deal while the Japanese got one of the worst deals.

What remains to be decided is what sort of organization will oversee the creation and distribution of new Amero. That is why the operation to flush out the true owners of the Federal Reserve Board is crucial.

As for the Euro, so far no deal has been reached and the currency still appears to be doomed. Dust off your Deutschemarks if you have any is our advice.

Although the turbulence and tension is expected to continue possibly for another two years, it is quite clear that all the major global structures created after World War 2 will be totally changed when the dust finally settles.

The Trillion Dollar Criminal Case

…Against Top Davos, UN Officials & Others Will Go Ahead Despite Sudden Death of Key Witness by Benjamin Fulford September 6, 2010
Criminal charges will be filed this week in New Jersey in a $1 trillion robbery case that implicates top officials of the World Economic Forum (Davos) top United Nations officials including UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and members of the Italian P2 Masonic Lodge, according to top US law enforcement officials and lawyers for the owners of the over $1 trillion in stolen financial instruments.

The individual directly responsible for stealing the funds, P2’s Daniele Dal Bosco was recorded asking Giancarlo Bruno “Head of the Financial Services Industry” at Davos to have myself and three other individuals murdered.

In addition, Joe Bendana, the man who assisted in the case within the US on behalf of Neil Keenan and also provided affidavits to other governments and Interpol was also threatened directly by Dal Bosco 4 days before he was found murdered in his residence, Newark, New Jersey, last Saturday, September 4, 2010.

Police are treating the death of Bendana as a homicide because of the threats and because there was a security breach at his residence the night he died.

As soon as Bruno’s name was made public by this writer, we were contacted by a senior P2 Lodge member who offered “an international scoop,” involving impossible amounts of Philippine gold, UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon and an individual by the name of Marco Di Mauro.

This photograph of an alleged Philippine bond worth “Five Hundred Dodecallion USD-CFR-Trilateral Commission,” was sent as proof.

There is no such number as a Dodecallion

(FALSE – see : )

but the “bond” had number 5 followed by 46 zeroes.

We are waiting for more coherent information from this source. The Trilateral Commission was founded in July of 1973. Clearly it does not fall in line with the date, October 24-25, 1966, issued on the Mother Gold Guarantee Deposit.

How could this have been issued when the Trilateral Commission did not exist at this time? I believe they are attempting to discredit this writer.

The entire incident began in June 2009 when two Japanese were illegally detained by Italian Treasury police and had $134.5 billion worth of bonds they were carrying confiscated. This incident was reported briefly in the international media before being dismissed as a “fraud.” However, the Japanese were not detained because they had diplomatic passports.

The bonds were real and were illegally confiscated by the Italian Treasury Police.

Shortly after this incident, the P2 Lodge, at the bequest of the Italian Police offered to assist them in cashing these bonds, which are owned by an astronomically wealthy Asian family. They offered the bonds back to this family at 10% of the face value but the family had no intention of allowing themselves to be extorted relating to bonds they already owned.

At a later date a family associate agreed to protect a further $1 trillion worth of financial instruments and they were placed into the custodianship of P2 “banker” Daniele Dal Bosco (Mr. Dal Bosco is actually not a banker nor ever has been a banker).

Dal Bosco then absconded with the bonds and tried to cash them variously with the UN with the assistance of Giancarlo Bruno of the World Economic Forum who is one of the coordinators. It is purported that Mr. Bruno set up the entire operation with the UN and OITC which Dal Bosco turned to for support once they recognized that Neil Keenan was not going to allow them to steal the bonds.

Dal Bosco states that he is working with his lawyer, Interpol and the UN but makes it perfectly clear to this writer that he refers everything over to OITC (he has no attorney holding the bonds to respond to), has never spoken to Interpol and the UN and Dal Bosco/Bruno/World Economic Forum/UN/David Sale/OITC are some of the known co-conspirators of this theft.

The OITC is headed by a Cambodian by the name of R.C. Dam.

Dam was at one point the designated heir of Indonesia’s Sukarno as signatory to a large pool of gold stored in various parts of Asia (This is the same gold that was supposed to back the new US dollar that President Kennedy was assassinated for trying to issue).

However, Dam was stripped of this power after the OITC was involved in a series of fraud cases. As a result, the bonds cannot be cashed by them. Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi also tried unsuccessfully to cash the bonds with the Chinese government.

Dal Bosco has been under complete surveillance since the beginning of this incident. That is why intelligence agencies recorded his requests for murder contracts and his threats to various individuals. Furthermore case files have been opened up against Dal Bosco in Milan, Italy and in Interpol.

Interpol is now actively involved as are most of the world’s intelligence agencies because they believe the trail in this case will lead eventually to the World Economic Forum, the UN and a group of Oligarchs who have been plotting to create a fascistic world government. These Oligarchs have also been trying to start World War 3 and carry out an unprecedented genocide of two thirds of the world’s population.

This case also illustrates some of the absurd and bizarre goings on now taking place in the esoteric world of high finance.

Senior sources report there is still chaos in the Western corridors of power, especially Washington D.C. because of the impending bankruptcy of the Federal Reserve Board.

There are moves, reported in our last newsletter, to launch a Gold Backed Amero to replace the US dollar. However, a different faction is still pushing for a Gold backed Treasury dollar controlled by the Congress. There is no conclusion to this fight but the turmoil is expected to intensify as the September 31 US fiscal year end approaches.

Because of this chaos Chinese and Asian sources are now offering to sell large denominations of US Dollars and Euros at a 37% discount to super-wealthy individuals.

The only thing that is certain about all these financial shenanigans is that the global governmental structures set up after World War 2 are all starting to collapse.


NWO plan:

Who is the NWO ? :

Bilderbergers & Bohmenian Grove ? :

Dodecallion, Endecallion, Decallion, Nonillion, Octillion, Septillion, Sextillion, Quintillion, Quadrillion, Trillion & Billion

April 21, 2015

Five Hundred Dodecallion USD CFR Trilateral Commission – Mother Gold Guarantee Deposit Account Set

10 – ten
100 – one hundred
1.000 – one thousand
1.000.000 – a million – a billion – a trillion – a quadrillion – a quintillion – a sextillion – a septillion – an octillion – a nonillion – a decallion

an endecallion

a dodecallion


How you can earn money on Forex

This is the most important information you will ever get. It’s the foundation. Without the application of these simple rules the question of how you can earn money on Forex will remain idle. I’m going to reveal the ‘no secret’ secret in this article.))) What do you think is the main reason why traders fail? The reason why a lot of traders have gone bankrupt, and they are not only beginners. It’s overwork of the deposit. It’s the work without following the Money Management rules. Here is the key phrase:

Money Management, abbreviated ММ

So the main reason for the traders’ failure when trading in the Forex market is the violation of these rules. The work is carried out with too big lots; too much money in relation to the deposit is thrown in trading in anticipation of big and fast money; the trader risks too large part of the deposit in each transaction, what is not acceptable not only in the Forex market of course, but in any other Financial market too..

Warned means armed. If you know the main reason for the possible failure, you can prevent it. But excuse me, how can we know with what forces, with which lot we can enter the transaction, how we can earn money on Forex and not lose it? The science of how to manage with money correctly is Money Management, abbreviated MM. I have prepared the greatest material on Money Management, this is the best material of those I know. I use the rules set out exactly in this book in my trade. So, gentlemen, let me introduce it: Ryan Jones “Playing by the Numbers to Make Millions”. From this book you can learn what the better way to trade is: to trade with a permanent lot or to increase the lot with the growth of the deposit; when you can increase the lot and in what proportions. Pay attention to the concept of “Delta”, I consider it the main point in the book. If to speak about the accepted standards, the common risk, which I also uphold in my trading, is generally considered the risk of 2.5 percent of the total deposit. Thus we risk only 2.5 percent in each transaction. If a trader is working with several currency pairs simultaneously or if multiple orders will be opened on one currency pair; for example it’s assumed that 5 orders can be opened simultaneously, well then 2.5 divided by 5 orders, we get 0.5% risk of the deposit for each transaction. Thus the total risk of all the transactions must not exceed 2.5%.

For the simple and fast calculation, not to waste time when trading I’ve prepared the table in the program Microsoft Excel. If someone doesn’t have Excel, the table will also work successfully in the free program OpenOffice. There is nothing to explain about the table, actually, everything is written there. The result in red color and big figures will be given in the table, this is the size of a lot which you are to trade with for a given risk. You can download this program in the section named “Indicators”.

The issue of Money Management should also include the ratio of the profitable trades to the unprofitable ones. It’s clear that if a trader makes 6 transactions in loss and 4 in profit, you should expect gradual decrease of funds on the deposit in result. This statement is true only partly. It’s true only in the occasion if in each trading deal the potential ratio profit/loss is equal to one or less than one. So in each deal we make

10 – ten
100 – one hundred
1.000 – one thousand
1.000.000 – a million – a billion – a trillion – a quadrillion – a quintillion – a sextillion – a septillion – an octillion – a nonillion – a decallion

an endecallion

a dodecallion

or loss equal to the projected profit. It can be different. I gave one of the examples of how you can earn money on Forex with an apparently smaller number of the positive transactions than the unprofitable ones, on this page: Modifications of Forex “Revenge” strategy, where in particular is shown the example that you can make 15 transactions, only 3 of which are profitable and 12 are not, but still remain in profit. How can it be possible? Very simple. The ratio profit/loss more than one. In each transaction we plan to have a profit of 6 times more than the potential loss in the same transaction. So 12 transactions which end in tears give us 12*2.5= -30%. 3 transactions closed on Take Profit bring us the planned six fold profit. 3*(2.5*6)= +45%. 45 – 30= 15% profit to the deposit. Let’s summarize:

Is it possible to earn on Forex constantly and stable? Is a constant steady income possible on Forex? Yes, if the trading strategy is considered 46.84% of votes (185) Yes, if the monthly income is comparatively small 7.34% of votes (29) Yes, if the broker doesn’t prevent 9.87% of votes (39) With a large share of luck 4.81% or votes (19) Only if the strategy is of medium or long term 3.29% of votes (13) Unlikely, because of the market changeability 2.53% of votes (10) It’s impossible, profit is followed by loss 6.84% of votes (27) I do not know… 18.48% of votes (73) Total votes: 395

  1. You know now that the main reason for failure in the financial markets is overwork of the deposit. Never, never, never allow it. 2. Choose the strategies in which the ratio of the profitable transactions to the unprofitable ones would be in favor of the profitable transactions. Ten transactions should in the worst case account for 6 profitable and only 4 unprofitable. It’s better to have seven cakes and one candle. It’s better to have 8-9 profitable and 1-2 unprofitable ones. There are several of the satisfying similar strategies posted on this site. 3. The ratio profit/loss must be in favor of profit again. 1.5 to 1, 2 to 1, 3 to 1, etc., the more favor of the profit is – the more reliable your trade is.

If you haven’t started trading with the real money yet, you surely must learn this data at first. Place Money Management at the top of your trade. Playing with numbers can really perform miracles in Forex market, if you play these numbers correctly. The issue of Money Management is paramount. The first commandment of a trader says: “SAVE the deposit and after that multiply it”.

One Last Look At The Real Economy Before It Implodes – Part 5

April 20, 2015
One Last Look At The Real Economy Before It Implodes – Part 5

Thursday, 16 April 2015 04:54 Brandon Smith

Since I began writing analysis for the liberty movement more than eight years ago, I have always said that we will know when the endgame of the globalists is upon us when the criminals come out into the light of day and admit to their crimes. At that moment, it will be because they no longer fear either the repercussions or their plans being obstructed.

As I plan to show in this installment of my series on the hidden fiscal collapse of America, the endgame has indeed arrived. At the very least, the international elites seem to think success is within their grasp, for they now openly expose their own criminality. But they do so in a way that attempts to divert blame or to rationalize their actions as being for the “greater good.”

In Part 4 of this series, I discussed the reality of the false East/West paradigm and the fact that the “conflict” between Eastern and Western interests is nothing more than Kabuki theater constructed by globalists and designed to mesmerize the masses. You see, the problem with most people is that they tend to let their innate sense of tribalism drive them to take sides in war without understanding the fundamental root of that war. In most cases, they believe one side must be “good” and one side must be “bad.” Globalists understand this weakness of human collectivism, and they exploit it as often as possible. They create conflicts from out of the void, conflicts in which BOTH sides are controlled. Then, they let the masses fumble like idiots trying to set the noose around the other guy’s neck.

The East/West paradigm is just another in a long line of false confrontations engineered by the elites, but it is one that is most dangerous to the liberty movement itself. In our rage over the destruction of freedom and prosperity within our own country, some of us have come to assume that the source of all that is unholy bubbles at the heart of U.S. corporate and government activity and that the East is in the midst of some kind of rebellion. This is simply nonsense.

Recently, a reader sent me a link that reminded me of comments made by Rep. Louis T. McFadden, chairman of the House Banking Committee, on May 4, 1933. In the wake of his battle against the Federal Reserve, he said:

“… the treacherous signing away of American rights at the 7-power conference at London in July 1931 … put the Federal Reserve System under the control of the Bank of International Settlements.”

Even in 1933, there were some people who could see that the Federal Reserve was just an errand boy, an economic hit man for a more powerful entity. Sadly, McFadden died in 1936 from coronary thrombosis before he could make any headway in his crusade. The truth he stamped into the public record, though, lives on; and it is a truth that many people just don’t want to hear. It is easier to quantify the threat of the Federal Reserve. It is easier to believe that the Fed either controls the entire game or (for the more sheep-minded citizenry) that the Fed is a harmless “quasi-governmental body.” Many of us in the movement want to believe it is the gateway to the seventh circle of hell because if the Fed dies, then we win. And the Fed appears to be killable, most notably in light of certain actions on the part of the East. Unfortunately, the problem is far more complex.

As McFadden exposed, the Fed is merely a tentacle, one of many slithering at the behest of a larger vampire squid. The Bank for International Settlements appears to be the eye of the leviathan. I have been happy to see that the BIS is gaining more and more attention from the alternative media as a primary threat to the stability of the world. Zero Hedge published a very interesting article on the BIS banking cabal recently, excerpted from a book by Adam LeBor and titled “Meet The Secretive Group That Runs The World.”

Of course, this is not the first exposé on the BIS. Even Harper’s published a surprisingly honest (though only half the story) piece on the bank, titled “Ruling The World Of Money,” back in 1983. In it, the magazine claims that “…the unabashed purpose of its (BIS) elite monthly meetings is to coordinate and, if possible, to control all monetary activities in the industrialized world.”

Any central bank that ends up on the membership roster of the BIS should be for all intents and purposes considered a pawn of the BIS. This includes the central banks of Eastern nations supposedly in opposition to Western power. The very beginning history of the BIS is stained with blood, since it financially played both sides of World War II and aided the funding of the Nazi apparatus. Keep in mind that Germany, Japan and the Allies were all members of the BIS from 1931 on and remained members through the war. Bankers have been pitting countries against each other for a very long time, and they have no loyalties to any particular nation.

The BIS had to fade into the background for a time after its partnership with fascists was made public after the war. So the elites formed yet another monstrosity, the International Monetary Fund, to take its place in the public eye. However, the BIS continues to this day to pull the strings of the world’s central banks and, by extension, the world’s governments.

The strategy of engineered conflict has not changed. I have written numerous articles on the undeniable collusion between Russia and the IMF, including the avid Russian support for the IMF’s new global reserve currency, the Special Drawing Rights. You can read those articles here, here and here.

Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin have continued their love affair with the IMF since 2009, when they called for the SDR to become the world reserve currency.

Last year, Putin reasserted the goal of the BRICS to become more involved (enveloped) in the IMF system:

“In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests. First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank’s decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this.”

I also have been covering the Chinese shift away from the dollar and into the arms of the IMF’s currency basket for years.

The great lie today is that China and Russia are anti-New World Order. Yet as I discussed in my last article, China (and Russia) have consistently called for a global conversion into the SDR basket system, and they want this system to be run by the IMF. The IMF, in turn, has consistently called for the end of the dollar as the world reserve currency and has openly embraced institutions like the new Asian regional bank, the AIIB, which is dominated by China, despite the fact that many people wrongly believe that the AIIB is somehow “competition” to the IMF or World Bank.

This excerpt comes from the International Business Times:

World Bank managing director Mulyani Indrawati told Xinhua in an interview.

“We will definitely open for cooperation with AIIB [sic]. Even now, we are working very closely in the beginning and looking at the setting, principle and framework of this institution.”

She also dismissed worries that the AIIB will compete against the World Bank or existing regional development banks and noted the global need for infrastructure is huge to accommodate multiple organisations.

Speaking at the opening of the China Development Forum in Beijing, IMF chief Christine Lagarde said the IMF would be “delighted” to co-operate with AIIB, and the institutions have “massive” room for cooperation.

More on the history of China and its partnership with the New World Order can be found in James Corbett’s excellent video analysis here.

At the level of international banking and monetary policy, there is absolutely NO indication of any legitimate conflict between the East and the West. Again, such battles are only theater for the masses. But what purpose does this theater serve?

The fake economic war between East and West provides cover and rationale for the true goal of the internationalists: the destruction of the dollar as the world reserve currency and the ascendency of the SDR global monetary system. The endgame of the bankers is, of course, global government. It has been the longtime dream of the Fabian socialists permeating the central banking universe. A global currency system and centralized economic management are first-step psychological weapons against the public. If the world operates on a singular currency mechanism and a singular economic authority, why not have a singular governmental system as well?

The mistake many liberty movement analysts make is the assumption that the internationalists are somehow dedicated to U.S. interests. The idea that globalists have any loyalties to any sovereign government is a ridiculous notion. Fabians hate sovereign separations between nations (as much as they hate individual liberties), and they seek to ultimately destroy all boundaries for the sake of a singular global fiscal-political edifice.

But the elites cannot simply kill the dollar and replace it outright. They need a magic trick, a smoke-and-mirrors hologram, a sexy assistant in a sequined bathing suit and fireworks galore while they pull their global basket reserve out of a top hat. The false East/West paradigm is the perfect distraction. What better way to destroy the dollar and conjure a new world reserve than to pit one block of nations you dominate against the other block of nations you dominate and blame the resulting economic catastrophe on the “barbarism of sovereign nationalism,” which you also plan to erase in due course?

The elites are preparing for this event, and they are not content only to trigger it then sit back and watch it happen. They also hope to construct a new image for themselves as the prophets who tried to warn the world — the financial “sages” who would be our rescuers.

The criminals are coming into the light, and they are wearing the masks of saviors.

Alan Greenspan is now suddenly a staunch promoter of economic caution, warning that “something big … a significant market event …” is about to happen, and that gold is now a good investment as opposed to the dollar.

Janet Yellen has openly conceded that cash is not a convenient store of value.

Jamie Dimon is getting in on the prognosticator action, asserting that another financial crisis is coming.

The IMF now consistently warns of “shadow banking risks” bringing disaster to the economic environment.

The World Bank has been polite enough to warn the public that “now is the time to prepare for the next crisis.”

The BIS now produces statements on a regular basis predicting a possible “violent reversal of global markets,” just as it conveniently alerted the public to the possibility of credit collapse in 2007 right before the derivatives crisis.

Literally every elitist and his drunken uncle now publicly discuss the danger of another market crash. That’s a rather stark reversal from a few years ago when recovery was a mainstream absolute, Bernanke was being called a hero, and fiat stimulus was the fountain of youth. How would they know that such an event is coming? They built the conditions by which a collapse is inevitable, and now they want to purify themselves in the waters of Lake Minnetonka and absolve their institutions of all future ugliness.

I would like to point out, though, that banker warnings of volatility and crisis are generally given far too late for average people to act accordingly. I would also like to point out that the rising chorus of mainstream voices giving predictions of destabilization are also marginalizing and isolating the U.S. and the Federal Reserve as the root cause. The U.S. is nothing more than a storefront for elitist activities. And the Federal Reserve is a tentacle that can be sacrificed if it means achieving total centralization. All signs and evidence point to what the IMF calls the “great global economic reset.” The plans for this reset do not include U.S. prosperity or a thriving dollar.

If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.

You can contact Brandon Smith at:

for more NWO Sior Maschera insights:

NWO AIIB – Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

April 20, 2015


Will China’s Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank begin a new world order?

Summary: China has created the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and signed on enough nations to make it a significant global force, but opinions differ about its odds of success and long-term significance. Some people expect nothing; some expect the world to change. Here I review the various bets and pick a winner.



  1. The AIIB is perhaps important, & bad
  2. It’s big news. It’s the end of US rule.
  3. Skeptical voices, with good reason
  4. My conclusions
  5. For More Information

(1)  The mainstream view: the AIIB is perhaps important, but bad

For the mainstream view we turn to the Washington Post, where journalist Fareed Zakaria describes the situation and the consensus wisdom of its implications:

This summer, China spearheaded an agreement with Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa (known collectively as the “BRICS” countries) to create a financial organization that would challenge the International Monetary Fund. In October, Beijing launched a $50 billion Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, explicitly as an alternative to the World Bank. And last week, Xi declared that China would spend $40 billion to revive the old “Silk Road” trading route to promote development in the region.

… But if China uses its growing clout to keep asking countries to choose between the existing arrangements or new ones, it might create conditions for a new kind of Cold War in Asia. It will certainly help to undermine and destroy the current international order, which has been a platform on which peace and prosperity have flourished in Asia for 7 decades.

The Economist gives a deeper analysis, but being The Economist we should assume it gets the details right but misses the big picture. Excerpt:

But the real, unstated tension stems from a deeper shift: China will use the new bank to expand its influence at the expense of America and Japan, Asia’s established powers. China’s decision to fund a new multilateral bank rather than give more to existing ones reflects its exasperation with the glacial pace of global economic governance reform. The same motivation lies behind the New Development Bank established by the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa).

… Reforms to give China a little more say at the International Monetary Fund have been delayed for years, and even if they go through America will still retain far more power. China is, understandably, impatient for change. It is therefore taking matters into its own hands.


(2)  It’s big news. It’s the end of US rule.

Alarmists went wild as each new nation signed onto the AIIB. Such as Zero Hedge: “US Hegemony, Dollar Dominance Are Officially Dead As China Scores Overwhelming Victory In Bank Battle“. It’s “de-dollarization” of the world economy: hysterical article, hysterical article, more hysteria.

For an excited but sensible opinion, read this by Kishore Mahbuban (Dean of Singapore’s Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy). He sees the AIIB as “a Sign of American Decline”. Excerpt from his article in the Huffington Post:

Any objective and calm assessment of the Chinese decision to launch the AIIB would show that this is a bank whose time has come. The Asian Development Bank has estimated that Asia needs to spend at least $8 trillion in infrastructure investment. The American-dominated World Bank and related institutions cannot possibly fulfill this demand. China’s decision to use its reserves to boost Asian infrastructure investment was clearly welcomed in Asia. Given its spectacular success with developing world-class infrastructure in record time, China has a lot of expertise in this area. Asia needs this.


(3) Skeptical voices, with good reason

Some dismiss the likelihood of AIIB making waves, such as Erik Voeten (Assoc Prof of Geopolitics and Justice, Georgetown): “Why the U.S. effort to curb the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank is doomed to fail (and why it doesn’t matter all that much)“.

For a more accurate explanation we can turn to the latest by Michael Pettis: “Will the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) one day matter?” It’s brilliant and well worth reading (redundant: it’s by Michael Pettis). It’s long and technical (ditto). He uses China’s new AIIB as a springboard to correct several common misconceptions (e.g., about the Chinese RMB becoming a reserve currency).

This is not to say that the AIIB cannot become as important an institution as some of the more excited commentary suggests. It can, but only under certain fairly implausible conditions. If China’s economic rise during this century leads it not just to overtake the United States but to achieve a level comparable to that of the United States in the 1940s and 1950s, and if the RMB becomes the world’s dominant reserve currency, with Beijing understanding and accepting the full costs of having the RMB as the dominant reserve currency, and if Beijing chooses to implement its foreign policy objectives at least partly through the AIIB, its importance will rival that of the Bretton Woods institutions.

However if the 21st Century evolves into a bi-polar world, or a multipolar world, or if it continues to be dominated by the US, the AIIB’s history will resemble that of its many antecedents. It will join the long list of much-hyped initiatives aimed at transforming the global trading regime but now languish in obscurity, known primarily for absorbing university graduates from very prestigious schools who have failed their other job interviews.

This just means, in other words, that if Beijing occupies the same relation to the rest of the world that Washington did in the 1940s, and if, occupying this position, its ideas about what it expected from a global trade and currency regime had not changed during the next decade or two (which, given its very difficult expected rebalancing, as I will show, makes this very unlikely) then the AIIB can replicate the rather extraordinary impact of the Bretton Woods institutions. Note however that the AIIB itself will not play a role in China’s rise. It will be nothing more than one of the consequences of that rise, which is why even if this whole string of implausibilities were to become real, it is absurd to say that the AIIB itself changes anything.

The future

(4)  My conclusions

All of the above are correct in a sense. The AIIB is a small step by itself, of little importance during the next few years. From a long-term perspective it’s another step on the road to replacement of the US as global hegemon by a multi-polar system.

The international financial institutions are a key part of the current US-centric system; the World Bank is a key piece of that. Creating a competitor to the World Bank — the AIIB — required signing on many major nations. US government officials understood the importance of stopping China’s first steps, and strongly pressured our allies to not participate. That 46 nations signed on so far shows that by skill or luck China has chosen the right moment to act. Other nations have grown tired of our increasingly erratic prima donna act — one no longer justified by overwhelming US power — and are willing to publicly defy us by supporting an alternative.

The first step is the most difficult. China will find the next step easier to accomplish.

One Hundred Trillion Dollars – Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe

April 20, 2015

100,000,000,000,000 I promise to pay the bearer on demand one hundred trillion dollars for the reserve bank of Zimbabwe –

With what ? A roll of toilet paper ? Like all fiat paper currencies of the Central Banks of the World by NWO design……..hyper devaluation……….End the FED

Digital Gold – Bitcoin – Nathaniel Hopper

April 20, 2015

Bitcoin and the inside story of the misfits and millionaires trying to reinvent money – (FCC’s Net Neutrality ramifications TBD)

Cameron & Tyler Winklevoss (twins), investors in Bitcoins, were Co-Founders of Facebook with Mark Zuckerberg.

Published on Apr 12, 2013

TimesCast: The Times’s Nathaniel Popper discusses Bitcoin, the online currency that has attracted a number of investors, including Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.

Dutch Tulip Bubble, Tulip Mania of 1637 (first bubble collapse):

The Social Network (facebook story movie):

Vires in Numeris (strength in numbers = NWO Borg?) – 1 physical Bitcoin – Casascius :

The ultimate smoke and mirrors, snake oil……… no attention to the men behind the curtain of cryptography encryptions cryptocurrency crypto currencies  ……the Digital Internet Sequel for the NWO Central Banksters Federal Reserve Systems Wall of Secrecy…. 

$400 Million in Bitcoins Stolen by Hackers @ on 28 February 2014:

and an additional $400 Million in Bitcoins stolen @ on February 10, 2015 :

Peter Schiff Bitcoin versus Gold – published 21 Nov 2013:

With the surging popularity of Bitcoin, Peter Schiff sees another bubble in the making. Peter explains why Bitcoin is not “gold 2.0″ but fool’s gold. It’s modern day alchemy and you are assuming significant risks by “investing” in it. Like a pyramid scheme, many early adapters will profit from bitcoin, but those profits will come at the expense of the losses suffered by those who adapt later.

Ron Paul: Published on Dec 9, 2013

Former Rep. Ron Paul, (R-Texas), on the future of Bitcoins and the Federal Reserve.

Ron Paul: BitCoin Could Go Down In History As Destroyer Of The US Dollar



Currency DEVALUATION, Bitcoin, FIAT & NWO – Published on Feb 18, 2014

Gerald Celente – Bitcoin , Buck & Gold – Published on 10/29/14 :

“Money” is neutral. What is the root of all evil ? The LOVE of money. Thus the obvious evil potential to abuse this “power” by terrorists etc exists:

Infowars now accepts Bitcoin:

Bitcoin ‘Elites’ Plan Secret Bilderberg Style Confab

Top 50 members of the “ecosystem” to meet on secret Caribbean Island
Bitcoin 'Elites' Plan Secret Bilderberg Style Confab

He/they (NWO) who has the most computing power (Apple/Microsoft etc) monopolize the Bitcoin mining = creation of Bitcoins by the fastest computer system lottery game, thus having control over the system and Bitcoin supply and volatile values:

Bitcoin value from 2010 – 2015: from $0.00 to peak of $1,099.04  to currently $261.48

Bitcoin crash publicly predicted one day earlier by Mike Adams of Natural News

Published on Apr 10, 2013

This broadcast, from the April 9th, 2013 edition of the Alex Jones Show, shows Mike Adams of making bold, accurate predictions about the bitcoin crash ONE DAY BEFORE the actual crash took place.

The accuracy and timing of this prediction shocked many onlookers. In addition, Adams also published more details predictions in this article:…

From the video, by Adams:

“Eventually it’s going to crash hard. I bet my reputation on that Alex. I am 100% sure we are going to see a massive bitcoin crash at some point with an ultra-accelerated velocity. It will be the fastest crash of any currency in the history of human civilization. It will be a high-velocity crash. People are buying bitcoins who don’t know what bitcoins are and who have no use for them. These are speculators.”

Who was Bitcoin’s founder ? Satoshi Nakamotos :

Max Keiser on Russia Today in 7 March 2013:


Abby Martin of RT alks to Max Keiser, host of the Keiser Report, about the global economy and the growing popularity of the decentralized digital currency known as the Bitcoin.

In Cryptography We Trust ??? or IN GOD WE TRUST !!! 21 million AD Infinitum (supposed maximum of Bitcoins ever mined/created – counterfeited/confiscated/devalued/volatile/stolen/lost) – Libertas – Aequitas – Veritas (Liberty – Equity – Truth)

Remember Hal of Space Odyssey 2001 ? The Central Computer goes rogue on humanity……

NWO ? Bitcoin Created by Illuminati to Roll out Cashless Society & Mark of the Beast? – Mark Dice – in Cryptography we trust – libertas aequitas veritas – Fiat digital currency

NWO Bitcoin

April 17, 2015

Bitcoin Created by Illuminati to Roll out Cashless Society & Mark of the Beast? – Mark Dice – in Cryptography we trust – libertas aequitas veritas – Fiat digital currency

Who is John Gault – Atlas Shrugged 3 – Ayn Rand

April 16, 2015

unplugged, off the grid & under the radar……

Ayn Rand – Atlas Shrugged

Spectacle – Ota Benga

April 13, 2015

In 1904 Mbye OtaBenga , a Pigmy man from Congo, Central Africa was placed in a cage with monkeys as an exhibit in the New York City Zoo in the Bronx. The Astonishing life of Ota Benga – by Pamela Newkirk – The Carnegies & Rockefellers financed the zoo. The oppression of the 99% by the 1% and the herd mentality.


King Leopold II of Belgium in the 1880’s reined over the genocide of 10,000,000 Congolese. He was responsible for enslaving the Congolese Central African Nation as he sent military captains to the task of collecting 25 pounds of rubber per month per adult male plus ivory in exchange for giving the entire village only a single kilo of salt as payment. Starvations, mutilations, pillage, plunder, massacres, floggings of the Congolese natives is how Leopold gained the wealth to construct what came to be known as Villa La Leopolda which in 2007 was the world’s most expensive estate @ US$ 750 million. Ota Benga was from this Congo era.

Left to Tell – Immaculee Ilibagiza

April 10, 2015

Discovering God Among the Rwandan Holocaust – Rwanda Genocide Central Africa 1994

Hotel Rwanda Movie – Hutu & Tutsi 1 million slaughtered while the world turned their backs


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,176 other followers

%d bloggers like this: